The concept of an ad hoc hypothesis

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/0039-3681(75)90006-0
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 20,898
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Elie Zahar (1973). Why Did Einstein's Programme Supersede Lorentz's? (I). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
J. Christopher Hunt (2012). On Ad Hoc Hypotheses. Philosophy of Science 79 (1):1-14.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Alexander Rosenberg (1975). Propter Hoc, Ergo Post Hoc. American Philosophical Quarterly 12 (3):245 - 254.
Dan Lloyd (1999). Consciousness Should Not Mean, but Be. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):158-159.
James Franklin (1991). Healthy Scepticism. Philosophy 66 (257):305 - 324.
Quassim Cassam (2009). Can the Concept of Knowledge Be Analysed? In Patrick Greenough & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Williamson on Knowledge. OUP Oxford
Rupert Sheldrake (2006). Morphic Fields. World Futures 62 (1 & 2):31 – 41.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

38 ( #107,957 of 1,907,520 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #159,567 of 1,907,520 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.