Victim and Society: Sharing Wrongs, but in Which Roles? [Book Review]

Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):187-203 (2014)
This paper discusses what kinds of conflicts arise when a crime has been committed, and with whom—and in which of their possible roles—the offender should be seen as having such conflicts. The possible roles of the victim are in focus, as is the constitutive role of the act of criminalizing a certain kind of behavior. It is argued that while in the tort conflict the victim should be seen as a party qua him- or herself in a ‘fuller’ sense (and with full freedom on how to handle the conflict, including dropping it), in the criminal law conflict it is community, the ‘we’, that should be looked upon as the party to the conflict with the offender. The victim should not be seen as excluded from the criminal law conflict, though: to the contrary, he or she is a member of community and has an important role to play. This role, however, needs to be strictly defined in a way that gives the victim the function of a certain kind of representative for ‘us’, the community. This role should not allow the victim much room to influence how the criminal law conflict is handled. The model I am suggesting presupposes—I think, at least—that criminal law conflict and tort conflict should be handled together at the same trial
Keywords Victim  Complainant  Defendant  Criminalization  Sharing wrongs  Community  Punishment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-012-9188-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Stephen David Ross (2010). Self with Others. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:173-191.
David Hilfiker (2001). From the Victim's Point of View. Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (4):255-263.
Helen Frowe (2008). Threats, Bystanders and Obstructors. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):365-372.
R. A. Duff (2010). Towards a Theory of Criminal Law? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Joe Giffels (2010). Sharing Data is a Shared Responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):801-803.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

5 ( #572,499 of 1,902,542 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #329,673 of 1,902,542 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.