Victim and Society: Sharing Wrongs, but in Which Roles? [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-17 (forthcoming)
|Abstract||This paper discusses what kinds of conflicts arise when a crime has been committed, and with whom—and in which of their possible roles—the offender should be seen as having such conflicts. The possible roles of the victim are in focus, as is the constitutive role of the act of criminalizing a certain kind of behavior. It is argued that while in the tort conflict the victim should be seen as a party qua him- or herself in a ‘fuller’ sense (and with full freedom on how to handle the conflict, including dropping it), in the criminal law conflict it is community, the ‘we’, that should be looked upon as the party to the conflict with the offender. The victim should not be seen as excluded from the criminal law conflict, though: to the contrary, he or she is a member of community and has an important role to play. This role, however, needs to be strictly defined in a way that gives the victim the function of a certain kind of representative for ‘us’, the community. This role should not allow the victim much room to influence how the criminal law conflict is handled. The model I am suggesting presupposes—I think, at least—that criminal law conflict and tort conflict should be handled together at the same trial|
|Keywords||Victim Complainant Defendant Criminalization Sharing wrongs Community Punishment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matthew Lister (2009). Criminal Law Conversations: &Quot;dESERT: EMPIRICAL, NOT METAPHYSICAL" and "CONTRACTUALISM AND THE SHARING OF WRONGS&Quot;. In Paul Robinson, Kimberly Ferzan & Stephen Garvey (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations.
Stephen David Ross (2010). Self with Others. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:173-191.
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (forthcoming). 'To Serve and Protect': The Ends of Harm by Victor Tadros. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-23.
Anne McLeer (1998). Saving the Victim: Recuperating the Language of the Victim and Reassessing Global Feminism. Hypatia 13 (1):41 - 55.
Margaret P. Gilbert (2005). Shared Values, Social Unity, and Liberty. Public Affairs Quarterly 19 (1).
David Hilfiker (2001). From the Victim's Point of View. Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (4):255-263.
Mark A. Pitt & Yun Tang (2013). What Should Be the Data Sharing Policy of Cognitive Science? Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):214-221.
Richard Sosis (2004). Insights From Ifaluk: Food Sharing Among Cooperative Fishers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):568-569.
Joan E. Sieber (1991). Openness in the Social Sciences: Sharing Data. Ethics and Behavior 1 (2):69 – 86.
P. Langat, D. Pisartchik, D. Silva, C. Bernard, K. Olsen, M. Smith, S. Sahni & R. Upshur (2011). Is There a Duty to Share? Ethics of Sharing Research Data in the Context of Public Health Emergencies. Public Health Ethics 4 (1):4-11.
Tyrone Kirchengast, Recent Developments in Victim Agency in the New South Wales Justice System: The Case of Victim Impact Statements.
Helen Frowe (2008). Threats, Bystanders and Obstructors. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):365-372.
Michaele L. Ferguson (2013). Sharing Democracy. Oxford University Press.
R. A. Duff (2010). Towards a Theory of Criminal Law? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Joe Giffels (2010). Sharing Data is a Shared Responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):801-803.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-06
Total downloads2 ( #246,859 of 738,966 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,966 )
How can I increase my downloads?