Topoi 23 (1):71-100 (2004)
|Abstract||I provide a survey of the contents of the works belonging to Aristotle's Organon in order to define their nature, in the light of his declared intentions and of other indications (mainly internal ones) about his purposes. No unifying conception of logic can be found in them, such as the traditional one, suggested by the very title Organon, of logic as a methodology of demonstration. Logic for him can also be formal logic (represented in the main by the De Interpretatione), axiomatized syllogistic (represented in the main by the Prior Analytics) and a methodology of dialectical and rhetorical discussion. The consequent lack of unity presented by those works does not exclude that both the set of works called Analytics and the set of works concerning dialectic (Topics and Sophistici Elenchi) form a unity, and that a certain priority is attributed to the analytics with respect to dialectic.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George Boger (1998). Completion, Reduction and Analysis: Three Proof-Theoretic Processes in Aristotle'sprior Analytics. History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):187-226.
Jonathan Lear (1980). Aristotle and Logical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Thom (2010). Three Conceptions of Formal Logic. Vivarium 48 (1-2):228-242.
Thom Paul (2010). Three Conceptions of Formal Logic. Vivarium 48 (1-2):228-242.
David Hitchcock (2000). Fallacies and Formal Logic in Aristotle. History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):207-221.
John Corcoran (2003). Aristotle's Prior Analytics and Boole's Laws of Thought. History and Philosophy of Logic. 24 (4):261-288.
Alexander (1999). On Aristotle's "Prior Analytics". Cornell University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #31,903 of 549,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?