Topoi 23 (1):71-100 (2004)
|Abstract||I provide a survey of the contents of the works belonging to Aristotle's Organon in order to define their nature, in the light of his declared intentions and of other indications (mainly internal ones) about his purposes. No unifying conception of logic can be found in them, such as the traditional one, suggested by the very title Organon, of logic as a methodology of demonstration. Logic for him can also be formal logic (represented in the main by the De Interpretatione), axiomatized syllogistic (represented in the main by the Prior Analytics) and a methodology of dialectical and rhetorical discussion. The consequent lack of unity presented by those works does not exclude that both the set of works called Analytics and the set of works concerning dialectic (Topics and Sophistici Elenchi) form a unity, and that a certain priority is attributed to the analytics with respect to dialectic.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Corcoran (2003). Aristotle's Prior Analytics and Boole's Laws of Thought. History and Philosophy of Logic. 24 (4):261-288.
David Hitchcock (2000). Fallacies and Formal Logic in Aristotle. History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):207-221.
Thom Paul (2010). Three Conceptions of Formal Logic. Vivarium 48 (1-2):228-242.
Paul Thom (2010). Three Conceptions of Formal Logic. Vivarium 48 (1-2):228-242.
Jonathan Lear (1980). Aristotle and Logical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
George Boger (1998). Completion, Reduction and Analysis: Three Proof-Theoretic Processes in Aristotle'sprior Analytics. History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):187-226.
Alexander (1999). On Aristotle's "Prior Analytics". Cornell University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #34,698 of 722,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,644 of 722,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?