A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2007)
Does the right to life under article 2 ECHR include the right to terminate one's life? Does the right to private life under article 8 ECHR include the right to sleep at night free from airplane noise? Does the right to property under article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR entitle the former King of Greece to claim compensation for the expropriation of royal property, following a referendum? Do homosexual couples have a right to adopt under article 8 ECHR? This book looks at both how the European Convention on Human Rights has, and ought to, be interpreted. Unlike a purely doctrinal approach, it aims at proposing an evaluative theory of interpretation for the European Convention on Human Rights. And, unlike a purely normative account, it seeks to locate interpretive values within the history of the ECHR by surveying and analysing all the relevant judgements of the European Court of Human Rights. Consequently, the book discusses cases as much as it discusses philosophical theories, striking an appropriate balance between the two. Examining how law should be interpreted and what legal rights individuals have, this book raises important questions of political morality that are both capable - and in need of - principled justification. George Letsas argues that evolutive interpretation does not refer to how most European member States now understand their obligations under the Convention but to how they should understand them given the egalitarian values that they share. He defends the idea of an emerging consensus combined with a theory of autonomous concepts as a way to provide the appropriate authority for the Court to adopt an egalitarian theory of human rights. A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a philosophically informed study of the methods of interpretation used by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. By drawing on Anglo-Americal legal, political and moral philosophy, the book also aims to provide a normative theory of the foundations of the ECHR rights.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douwe Korff, The Right to Life: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Jill Marshall (2008). Women's Right to Autonomy and Identity in European Human Rights Law: Manifesting One's Religion. Res Publica 14 (3):177-192.
Kieran Oberman (2013). Beyond Sectarianism? On David Miller's Theory of Human Rights. Res Publica 19 (3):275-283.
Maurizio Mori & Demetrio Neri (2001). Perils and Deficiencies of the European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):323 – 333.
Dominik Zimmermann, Prohibitions to Appeal and Art. 6(1) Echr - the Case of Mendel Vs. Sweden From April 7, 2009.
Lars Reuter (2000). Human is What is Born of a Human: Personhood, Rationality, and an European Convention. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):181 – 194.
Rick Lawson (2010). Pt. 1. Setting the Scene: Human Rights and Health Ethics. Dwelling on the Threshold: On the Interaction Between the European Convention on Human Rights and the Biomedicine Convention. [REVIEW] In André den Exter (ed.), Human Rights and Biomedicine. Maklu.
Frederic Megret, The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights?
Anthony Pagden (2003). Human Rights, Natural Rights, and Europe's Imperial Legacy. Political Theory 31 (2):171-199.
Audrey Osler & Hugh Starkey (1994). Fundamental Issues in Teacher Education for Human Rights: A European Perspective. Journal of Moral Education 23 (3):349-359.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?