In defence of embodied cognition: a reply to Fred Adams [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (3):403-414 (2012)
|Abstract||Fred Adams (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9(4): 619–628, 2010) criticizes the theory of embodied cognition (EC) which holds that conceptual and linguistic thought is grounded in the brain’s perceptual and sensorimotor systems. Among other things, Adams claims that: (1) EC is potentially committed to an implausible criterion of sentence meaningfulness; (2) EC lacks claimed advantages over rival accounts of conceptual thought; (3) relevant experimental data do not show constitutive, but only causal, involvement of perception in conception; and (4) EC cannot account for the comprehension of abstract concepts. I respond to Adams that: (1) EC is not committed to an implausible criterion of meaningfulness, though it may be committed to holding that comprehension admits of degrees; (2) EC does have its claimed advantages over rival views; (3) the data do make a strong case for constitutive involvement and (4) a broad and comprehensive EC approach probably can account for the comprehension of abstract concepts|
|Keywords||Embodied cognition Simulation Symbol grounding Comprehension Linguistic meaning Perceptual symbols|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fred Adams (2010). Embodied Cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4):619-628.
Shannon Spaulding (2011). Embodied Social Cognition. Philosophical Topics 39 (1):141-162.
Larry Shapiro (2007). The Embodied Cognition Research Programme. Philosophy Compass 2 (2):338–346.
Fred Adams (forthcoming). What is a Cognitive Process? Foundations of Science:1-3.
Shannon Spaulding (2010). Embodied Cognition and Mindreading. Mind and Language 25 (1):119-140.
Sven Walter & Miriam Kyselo (2009). Fred Adams, Ken Aizawa: The Bounds of Cognition. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 71 (2):277-281.
Fred Feldman (1993). On the Consistency of Act- and Motive-Utilitarianism: A Reply to Robert Adams. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 70 (2):201 - 212.
Fred Adams, Robert Stecker & Gary Fuller (1993). The Floyd Puzzle: Reply to Yagisawa. Analysis 53 (1):36 - 40.
Robert Greenleaf Brice (2013). ‘The Whole Hurly-Burly’: Wittgenstein and Embodied Cognition. Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (1-2):49-58.
Cory D. Wright (2008). Embodied Cognition: Grounded Until Further Notice? British Journal of Psychology 99:157-164.
J. Matyja (2012). Travelling in Style From Standard Cognitive Science to Embodied Cognition. Review of “Embodied Cognition” by Lawrence Shapiro. Constructivist Foundations 7 (3):231-233.
Alvin Goldman & Frederique de Vignemont (2009). Is Social Cognition Embodied? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (10).
Dave Ward & Mog Stapleton (2012). Es Are Good. Cognition as Enacted, Embodied, Embedded, Affective and Extended. In Fabio Paglieri (ed.), Consciousness in Interaction: The role of the natural and social context in shaping consciousness.
Added to index2012-06-05
Total downloads14 ( #90,611 of 739,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?