David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):409-419 (2013)
As a member of the British Oxford Group, psychologist Richard Ryder marked the beginning of the modern animal rights and animal welfare movement in the seventies. By introducing the concept “speciesism.” Ryder contributed importantly to the expansion of this movement. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to Ryder’s moral theory, “painism”, that aims to resolve the conflict between the two predominant rival theories in animal ethics, the deontological of Tom Regan and the utilitarian of Peter Singer. First, this paper examines the kernel and historical sources of Ryder’s painist theory, linking it to the work of John Rawls and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Second, it examines Ryder’s critique of utilitarianism. It is argued that his critique of Singer’s use of the word “sentience” is unconvincing and that his critique of utilitarian aggregation as not taking a full account of the metaphysical separateness of persons, has already been countered and dealt with. Finally this paper looks at some of the counterintuitive implications of Ryder’s theory and argues that utilitarianism might have more resources for dealing with its own alleged counterintuitive implications than Ryder acknowledges
|Keywords||Richard Ryder Painism Animal ethics Utilitarianism Aggregation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jeremy Bentham (1780/2007). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Dover Publications.
Daniel M. Haybron (2008). The Pursuit of Unhappiness: The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being. OUP Oxford.
Gregory S. Kavka (1979). The Numbers Should Count. Philosophical Studies 36 (3):285 - 294.
Alastair Norcross (2009). Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights, and the Separateness of Persons. Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):76-95.
John Rawls (1971/2005). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard D. Ryder (1999). Painism: Some Moral Rules for the Civilized Experimenter. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (01):35-42.
Marius Usher (2004). Comment on Ryder's SINBAD Neurosemantics: Is Teleofunction Isomorphism the Way to Understand Representations? Mind and Language 19 (2):241-248.
Mark Rowlands (2009). Animal Rights: Moral Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Richard D. Ryder (2003). The Ethics of Pain. The Philosophers' Magazine 23 (23):40-42.
John Ryder (1999). Interpreting America: Russian and Soviet Studies of the History of American Thought. Vanderbilt University Press.
Dan Ryder (2002). Neurosemantics: A Theory. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
John Ryder (2004). The Implications of Ordinality. Newsletter of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy 32 (98):19-23.
Thomas Arthur Ryder (1953). Searchlight on Morals. London, Watts.
John Ryder (2013). Foreword. Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):2-3.
Robert Bass (2012). Lives in the Balance: Utilitarianism and Animal Research. In Jeremy Garrett (ed.), The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy. MIT Press.
T. T. B. Ryder (1994). Philip Ii. The Classical Review 44 (01):102-.
Added to index2012-02-23
Total downloads42 ( #42,902 of 1,100,092 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #90,386 of 1,100,092 )
How can I increase my downloads?