David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 34 (3):284-304 (2003)
A number of writers have tackled the task of characterizing the differences between analytic and Continental philosophy.I suggest that these attempts have indeed captured the most important divergences between the two styles but have left the explanation of the differences mysterious.I argue that analytic philosophy is usefully seen as philosophy conducted within a paradigm, in Kuhn’s sense of the word, whereas Continental philosophy assumes much less in the way of shared presuppositions, problems, methods and approaches.This important opposition accounts for all those features that have rightly been held to constitute the difference between the two traditions.I ﬁnish with some reﬂections on the relative superiority of each tradition and by highlighting the characteristic deﬁciencies of each
|Keywords||Continental analytic Kuhn paradigm|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bernard Arthur Owen Williams (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Thomas S. Kuhn (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Richard Rorty (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press.
Jacques Derrida (1995). Points . . .: Interviews, 1974-1994. Stanford University Press.
Michael A. E. Dummett (1993). Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Neil Levy (2009). Empirically Informed Moral Theory: A Sketch of the Landscape. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (1):3 - 8.
Neil Levy (2009). Empirically Informed Moral Theory: A Sketch of the Landscape. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (1):3-8.
Damian Veal (2005). Editorial Introduction. Angelaki 10 (1):1 – 31.
Similar books and articles
Dieter Freundlieb & Wayne Hudson (1998). Convergence and its Limits: Relations Between Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Philosophical Explorations 1 (1):28 – 42.
Jack Reynolds, James Chase, James Williams & Edwin Mares (2010). Introduction: Post-Analytic and Meta-Continental Philosophy. In James Williams, Jack Reynolds, James Chase & Edwin Mares (eds.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum
Lee Braver (2007). A Thing of This World: A History of Continental Anti-Realism. Northwestern University Press.
Simon Critchley (2001). Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Jack Reynolds, James Chase, James Williams & Edwin Mares (eds.) (2010). Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum.
Jack Reynolds & James Chase (2010). Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy, Co-Authored with James Chase, Stocksfield, UK: Acumen Publishing 2010. ISBN 978-1-84465-245-7. [REVIEW] Acumen.
Simon Critchley (1997). What is Continental Philosophy? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):347 – 363.
Babette E. Babich (2003). On the Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy : Nietzsche's Lying Truth, Heidegger's Speaking Language, and Philosophy. In C. G. Prado (ed.), A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Humanity Books
Franca D'Agostini (2001). From a Continental Point of View: The Role of Logic in the Analytic-Continental Divide. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):349 – 367.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads280 ( #8,807 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)26 ( #26,283 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?