Against the logicians

The Philosophers' Magazine 51 (51):80-86 (2010)
Abstract
Logic as a subject has existed for a long time. Aristotle and the Stoics identified some of its principles, as did Indian logicians. And this ancient logic underwent an extraordinary mathematical development in the last hundred and fifty years. So logic certainly exists, at least as a branch of mathematics. The question is whether it is anything more than that
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Nicholas Rescher (1964). The Development of Arabic Logic. [Pittsburgh]University of Pittsburgh Press.
    George Englebretsen (2002). Syllogistic: Old Wine in New Bottles. History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (1):31-35.
    Risto Vilkko (2007). The Problematic Reconstruction of the Development of Modern Logic. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:31-35.
    Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith (1987). Questions: An Essay in Daubertian Phenomenology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (3):353-384.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-12-02

    Total downloads

    20 ( #71,679 of 1,088,883 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #42,739 of 1,088,883 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.