David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Philosophers' Magazine 51 (51):80-86 (2010)
Logic as a subject has existed for a long time. Aristotle and the Stoics identified some of its principles, as did Indian logicians. And this ancient logic underwent an extraordinary mathematical development in the last hundred and fifty years. So logic certainly exists, at least as a branch of mathematics. The question is whether it is anything more than that
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Brendan Larvor (2012). How to Think About Informal Proofs. Synthese 187 (2):715-730.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Rescher (1964). The Development of Arabic Logic. [Pittsburgh]University of Pittsburgh Press.
W. C. Kneale (1962/1984). The Development of Logic. Oxford University Press.
George Englebretsen (2002). Syllogistic: Old Wine in New Bottles. History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (1):31-35.
Jaakko Hintikka (1996). The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Risto Vilkko (2007). The Problematic Reconstruction of the Development of Modern Logic. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:31-35.
David Dinsmore Comey (1966). Current Trends in Soviet Logic. Inquiry 9 (1-4):94 – 108.
Seyyed Mohammad Ali Hodjati (2008). Kātibī on the Relation of Opposition of Concepts. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (3):207-221.
Solomon Feferman, Harvey M. Friedman, Penelope Maddy & John R. Steel (2000). Does Mathematics Need New Axioms? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):401-446.
Meir Buzaglo (2002). The Logic of Concept Expansion. Cambridge University Press.
Jaakko Hintikka (2012). Which Mathematical Logic is the Logic of Mathematics? Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):459-475.
George Englebretsen (1981). Three Logicians: Aristotle, Leibniz, and Sommers and the Syllogistic. Van Gorcum.
David Sherry (2006). Formal Logic for Informal Logicians. Informal Logic 26 (2):199-220.
Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith (1987). Questions: An Essay in Daubertian Phenomenology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (3):353-384.
A. G. Hamilton (1978). Logic for Mathematicians. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads43 ( #92,482 of 1,789,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #82,997 of 1,789,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?