Cohen and kinds: A response to Nathan Nobis
Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):213–217 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNathan Nobis (2004). Carl Cohen's 'Kind' Arguments for Animal Rights and Against Human Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):43–59.
Nathan Nobis (2009). Interests and Harms in Primate Research. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):27-29.
Nathan Nobis (2002). Who Needs the 'Actual Future Principle'? Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):55-63.
Nathan Nobis (2002). Vegetarianism and Virtue. Social Theory and Practice 28 (1):135-156.
Nathan Nobis (2006). Moral Realism. Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):178-181.
Nathan Nobis (2002). Carl Cohen and Tom Regan, the Animal Rights Debate (Book Review). Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #162,017 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
