Conjoining mathematical empiricism with mathematical realism: Maddy's account of set perception revisited
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 145 (3):425 - 448 (2005)
Penelope Maddy’s original solution to the dilemma posed by Benacerraf in his (1973) ‘Mathematical Truth’ was to reconcile mathematical empiricism with mathematical realism by arguing that we can perceive realistically construed sets. Though her hypothesis has attracted considerable critical attention, much of it, in my view, misses the point. In this paper I vigorously defend Maddy’s (1990) account against published criticisms, not because I think it is true, but because these criticisms have functioned to obscure a more fundamental issue that is well worth addressing: in general – and not only in the mathematical domain – empiricism and realism simply cannot be reconciled by means of an account of perception anything like Maddy’s. But because Maddy’s account of perception is so plausible, this conclusion raises the specter of the broader incompatibility of realism and empiricism, which contemporary philosophers are frequently at pains to forget.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Philosophy of Language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Penelope Maddy (1995). Naturalism and Ontology. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (3):248-270.
Mark Colyvan (1998). In Defence of Indispensability. Philosophia Mathematica 6 (1):39-62.
Jeffrey W. Roland (2007). Maddy and Mathematics: Naturalism or Not. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):423 - 450.
Mark Colyvan (2007). Mathematical Recreation Versus Mathematical Knowledge. In Mary Leng, Alexander Paseau & Michael D. Potter (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press. 109--122.
Michael J. Shaffer (2006). Some Recent Appeals to Mathematical Experience. Principia 10 (2):143-170.
Adrian Riskin (1994). On the Most Open Question in the History of Mathematics: A Discussion of Maddy. Philosophia Mathematica 2 (2):109-121.
David MacCallum (2000). Conclusive Reasons That We Perceive Sets. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (1):25 – 42.
Dennis Lomas (2002). What Perception is Doing, and What It is Not Doing, in Mathematical Reasoning. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):205-223.
Michael Resnik (1995). Scientific Vs. Mathematical Realism: The Indispensability Argument. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (2):166-174.
Penelope Maddy (1990). Realism in Mathematics. Oxford University Prress.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #100,976 of 1,410,035 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,059 of 1,410,035 )
How can I increase my downloads?