David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Analytica 19 (32):91-106 (2004)
The paper examines the Cartesian and the Strawsonian answers to the question of why self-applied and other-applied mental predicates mean the same. While these answers relate to different, complementary aspects of this question, they seem and are usually considered as incompatible. Indeed, their apparent incompatibility constitutes a major objection to the Cartesian answer. A primary aim of the paper is to show that the Strawsonian answer does not pose a real problem to the Cartesian answer. Unlike other attempts to show this, the paper does not seek to undermine the Strawsonian answer. Indeed, its second aim is to defend this answer against these other attempts. The paper’s strategy in defending the Cartesian answer is to show that the framework underlying this answer can — indeed, for internal reasons, must — accommodate the Strawsonian answer. By showing this, the paper also shows that a Cartesian framework can provide a comprehensive answer to the aforementioned question, which is its third aim.
|Keywords||Descartes Strawson mental predicates meaning generality constraint personal identity|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
By Rowan Cruft (2006). Why Aren't Duties Rights? Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):175–192.
Bart Streumer (2007). Reasons and Entailment. Erkenntnis 66 (3):353 - 374.
Bart Streumer (2007). Inferential and Non-Inferential Reasoning. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):1-29.
Arnold Cusmariu (1979). On an Aristotelian Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):51 – 58.
Brie Gertler (2004). Simulation Theory on Conceptual Grounds. Protosociology 20:261-284.
Peter Pagin (2000). Publicness and Indeterminacy. In A. Orenstein & Petr Kotatko (eds.), Knowledge, Language and Logic: Questions for Quine. Kluwer Academic Print on Demand. 163--180.
[author unknown] (1907). Questions and Answers. The Classical Review 21 (7):220-220.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2008). What Does It Mean to Be One of Us? Journal of Anthropological Psychology 10:9-11.
Tanja Staehler (2008). What is the Question to Which Husserl's Fifth Cartesian Meditation is the Answer? Husserl Studies 24 (2):99-117.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #198,752 of 1,168,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,193 of 1,168,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?