Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (5):47-61 (2000)
|Abstract||As he recognizes, Taylor's view of practical reasoning commits him to the existence of incommensurable world-views. However, he holds that it is in principle possible to overcome these incommensurabilities. He has two major arguments for this conclusion, which I label the argument from the human condition, and the transition argument. I show that the first argument, though perhaps successful in the case Taylor takes as an example, cannot be generalized. The second argument is even less successful, since all the evidence it produces is compatible with a thoroughgoing relativism. I point out, moreover, that even if Taylor's arguments were successful, they would not demonstrate that someone who chose to continue to reject the practice that had been vindicated would be irrational to do so. I conclude that there seems no way to circumvent the relativism to which Taylor's picture of practical reasoning leads. Key Words: incommensurability • practical reason • relativism • Charles Taylor.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
F. A. Carnevale & D. M. Weinstock (2011). Questions in Contemporary Medicine and the Philosophy of Charles Taylor: An Introduction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):329-334.
Ruth Abbey (2002). Pluralism in Practice: The Political Thought of Charles Taylor. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):98-123.
Gary Kitchen (1999). Charles Taylor: The Malaises of Modernity and the Moral Sources of the Self. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (3):29-55.
Michael Brownstein (2010). Conceptuality and Practical Action: A Critique of Charles Taylor's Verstehen Social Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):59-83.
John Rundell (2010). Charles Taylor and the Secularization Thesis. Critical Horizons 11 (1):119-132.
Charles Taylor (1995). Philosophical Arguments. Harvard University Press.
Charles Taylor, James Tully & Daniel M. Weinstock (eds.) (1994). Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Redhead (2001). Charles Taylor's Nietzschean Predicament: A Dilemma More Self-Revealing Than Foreboding. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (6):81-106.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #61,504 of 549,047 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,047 )
How can I increase my downloads?