Epistemological issues in phenomenological research: How authoritative are people's accounts of their own perceptions?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (4):451–462 (2006)
Science tends to find a solution to the problem of the unreliability of human perception by understanding objectivity as the absence of subjectivity. However, from a phenomenological point of view, subjectivity is not so much a problem as an inevitable starting-point. That does not mean that the problem of the correctness of people’s accounts of their own perceptions is no problem at all—in fact the problem is so great that the authority of a person’s knowledge of his or her own mind can be doubted. The problem of subjectivity can only be solved when it is related to the problem of interpretation. Analyses of narratives are interpretations of interpretations. The phenomenologist must make sure that the data he or she analyses are lived interpretations and not interpretations of interpretations
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
K. I. M. Jeong-hee (2011). Understanding the Lived Experience of a Sioux Indian Male Adolescent: Toward the Pedagogy of Hermeneutical Phenomenology in Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (6):630-648.
Jeong‐Hee Kim (2012). Understanding the Lived Experience of a Sioux Indian Male Adolescent: Toward the Pedagogy of Hermeneutical Phenomenology in Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (6):630-648.
Similar books and articles
Johanna Kujala (2010). Corporate Responsibility Perceptions in Change: Finnish Managers' Views on Stakeholder Issues From 1994 to 2004. Business Ethics 19 (1):14-34.
Deborah L. Leitsch (2004). Differences in the Perceptions of Moral Intensity in the Moral Decision Process: An Empirical Examination of Accounting Students. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (3):313-323.
Vivian Waddell (2007). A Phenomenological Description of the Inner Voice Experience of Ordinary People. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (8):35-57.
Andrew R. Smith & Jacqueline M. Martinez (1995). Signifying Harassment: Communication, Ambiguity and Power. [REVIEW] Human Studies 18 (1):63 - 87.
Cynthia Macdonald (2008). Consciousness, Self-Consciousness, and Authoritative Self-Knowledge. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):319-346.
Paul Cloke, Phil Cooke, Jenny Cursons, Paul Milbourne & Rebekah Widdowfield (2000). Ethics, Place and Environment, Reflexivity and Research: Encounters with Homeless People. Philosophy and Geography 3 (2):133 – 154.
Paul Cloke, Phil Cooke, Jerry Cursons, Paul Milbourne & Rebekah Widdowfield (2000). Ethics, Reflexivity and Research: Encounters with Homeless People. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (2):133 – 154.
Jill Kickul, Lisa K. Gundry & Margaret Posig (2005). Does Trust Matter? The Relationship Between Equity Sensitivity and Perceived Organizational Justice. Journal of Business Ethics 56 (3):205 - 218.
Sally J. Power & Lorman L. Lundsten (2005). Managerial and Other White-Collar Employees' Perceptions of Ethical Issues in Their Workplaces. Journal of Business Ethics 60 (2):185 - 193.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #45,974 of 1,139,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #165,020 of 1,139,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?