False predictions about the detectability of visual changes: The role of beliefs about attention, memory, and the continuity of attended objects in causing change blindness blindness
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):507-527 (2002)
Recently, a number of experiments have emphasized the degree to which subjects fail to detect large changes in visual scenes. This finding, referred to as “change blindness,” is often considered surprising because many people have the intuition that such changes should be easy to detect. Levin, Momen, Drivdahl, and Simons documented this intuition by showing that the majority of subjects believe they would notice changes that are actually very rarely detected. Thus subjects exhibit a metacognitive error we refer to as “change blindness blindness.” Here, we test whether CBB is caused by a misestimation of the perceptual experience associated with visual changes and show that it persists even when the pre- and postchange views are separated by long delays. In addition, subjects overestimate their change detection ability both when the relevant changes are illustrated by still pictures, and when they are illustrated using videos showing the changes occurring in real time. We conclude that CBB is a robust phenomenon that cannot be accounted for by failure to understand the specific perceptual experience associated with a change
|Keywords||*Attention *Stimulus Change *Visual Memory *Visual Perception Vision Disorders Visual Stimulation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Anna Loussouarn, Damien Gabriel & Joëlle Proust (2011). Exploring the Informational Sources of Metaperception: The Case of Change Blindness Blindness. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1489-1501.
Bruno Berberian, Stephanie Chambaron-Ginhac & Axel Cleeremans (2010). Action Blindness in Response to Gradual Changes. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):152-171.
Jun-Ichiro Kawahara (2010). Measuring the Spatial Distribution of the Metaattentional Spotlight. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):107-124.
Daniel T. Levin (2012). Concepts About Agency Constrain Beliefs About Visual Experience. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):875-888.
Similar books and articles
Melissa R. Beck, Daniel T. Levin & Bonnie L. Angelone (2007). Metacognitive Errors in Change Detection: Lab and Life Converge. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):58-62.
Mika Koivisto & Antti Revonsuo (2003). An ERP Study of Change Detection, Change Blindness, and Visual Awareness. Psychophysiology 40 (3):423-429.
Randolph Blake & Chai-Youn Kim (2005). Psychophysical Strategies for Rendering the Normally Visible Invisible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (8):381-388.
Melissa R. Beck, Daniel T. Levin & Bonnie L. Angelone (2007). Change Blindness Blindness: Beliefs About the Roles of Intention and Scene Complexity in Change Detection. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):31-51.
Gilles Pourtois, Michael De Pretto, Claude-Alain Hauert & Patrik Vuilleumier (2006). Time Course of Brain Activity During Change Blindness and Change Awareness: Performance is Predicted by Neural Events Before Change Onset. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (12):2108-2129.
Michael Niedeggen, Petra Wichmann & Petra Stoerig (2001). Change Blindness and Time to Consciousness. European Journal of Neuroscience 14 (10):1719-1726.
Daniel J. Simons, Christopher Chabris & Tatiana Schnur (2002). Evidence for Preserved Representations in Change Blindness. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (1):78-97.
Michael E. Silverman & Arien Mack (2006). Change Blindness and Priming: When It Does and Does Not Occur. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2):409-422.
Diego Fernandez-Duque & Ian Thornton (2000). Change Detection Without Awareness: Do Explicit Reports Underestimate the Representation of Change in the Visual System? Visual Cognition 7 (1):323-344.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #170,159 of 1,699,696 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,935 of 1,699,696 )
How can I increase my downloads?