David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (4):526-544 (1997)
An account of the relation between belief and practice is inseparable from a general theory of religion and religious discourse. Rejection of the one time popular, but now more or less defunct, nonrealist position of people such as D. Z. Phillips, Don Cupitt, and indeed Wittgenstein leaves contemporary theo rists in anthropology and the "history of religions" with basically the vastly different "literalist" and "symbolist" analyses of religion from which to choose. This article critically appraises John Skorupksi's influential defense of intellectualism. I argue that his dismissal of symbolist approaches is more theoretically radical than he recog nizes. It rejects outright some of the very foundations and staples of contempo rary anthropology in, for example, Durkheim. His argument for the rejection of the symbolist approach is examined. Skorupski's defense of intellectualism is set in the context of a problematically naive understanding of the nature and function of religion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Collier (2003). On Christian Belief: A Defence of a Cognitive Conception of Religious Belief in a Christian Context. Routledge.
John W. Cook (2004). The Undiscovered Wittgenstein: The Twentieth Century's Most Misunderstood Philosopher. Humanity Books.
Paul Helm (2001). The Indispensability of Belief to Religion. Religious Studies 37 (1):75-86.
D. Z. Phillips (2000). Recovering Religious Concepts: Closing Epistemic Divides. St. Martin's Press.
Ilkka Pyysia¨Inen (2003). True Fiction: Philosophy and Psychology of Religious Belief. Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):109-125.
Ilkka Pyysiäinen (2003). True Fiction: Philosophy and Psychology of Religious Belief. Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):109 – 125.
P. J. E. Kail (2007). Understanding Hume's Natural History of Religion. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):190–211.
Edward Berryman (2005). Belief, Apparitions, and Rationality: The Social Scientific Study of Religion After Wittgenstein. [REVIEW] Human Studies 28 (1):15 - 39.
Michael Luntley (1982). Understanding Anthropologists. Inquiry 25 (2):199 – 216.
Robert Bird (1999). Martin Heidegger and Russian Symbolist Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 51 (2):85-108.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #270,384 of 1,789,721 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,435 of 1,789,721 )
How can I increase my downloads?