‘It could just be an additional test couldn’t it?’:genetic testing for susceptibility to aggression and violence
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Much of the current genetic research into aggressive and violent behaviour focuses on young people and might appear to offer the hope of targeted prediction and intervention. In the UK data is collected on children from various agencies and collated to produce ‘at risk of offending’ identities used to justify intervention. Information from behavioural genetic tests could conceivably be included. Regulatory frameworks for collecting, storing and using information from DNA samples differ between the health service and the police particularly in the need for consent and the treatment of children. This paper draws on discussions with professionals involved with ‘problem’ young people to consider their views on the utility of genetic research for tackling violent/aggressive behaviour and the impact an identification of genetic susceptibility might have on their clients
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
V. Launis (2000). The Use of Genetic Test Information in Insurance: The Argument From Indistinguishability Reconsidered. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
Nancy Green (2012). Argumentation and Risk Communication About Genetic Testing: Challenges for Healthcare Consumers and Implications for Computer Systems. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
Ludvig Beckman (2004). Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Claudia Wild (2008). Polymorphism-Screening: Genetic Testing for Predisposition—Guidance for Technology Assessment. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 5 (1):1-14.
Barabara Biesecker (1998). Future Directions in Genetic Counseling: Practical and Ethical Considerations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):145-160.
Mairi Levitt, Genes, Environment and Responsibility for Violent Behaviour:‘Whatever Genes One has It is Preferable That You Are Prevented From Going Around Stabbing People’.
Eline Bunnik, Maartje Schermer & A. Cecile Janssens (2011). Personal Genome Testing: Test Characteristics to Clarify the Discourse on Ethical, Legal and Societal Issues. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):11-.
Joseph S. Alper & Jon Beckwith (1998). Distinguishing Genetic From Nongenetic Medical Tests: Some Implications for Antidiscrimination Legislation. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):141-150.
Chris MacDonald & Bryn Williams-Jones (2002). Ethics and Genetics: Susceptibility Testing in the Workplace. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):235 - 241.
M. Richards (2001). How Distinctive is Genetic Information? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):663-687.
Robert Samuel Wachbroit (1998). The Question Not Asked: The Challenge of Pleiotropic Genetic Tests. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):131-144.
Felix Thiele (2003). Genetic Tests in the Insurance System: Criteria for a Moral Evaluation. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):185-195.
Lainie Friedman Ross (2002). Predictive Genetic Testing for Conditions That Present in Childhood. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Added to index2011-01-29
Total downloads5 ( #265,502 of 1,692,645 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,248 of 1,692,645 )
How can I increase my downloads?