Jehovah's Witnesses, Pregnancy, and Blood Transfusions: A Paradigm for the Autonomy Rights of All Pregnant Women

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (2):171-189 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The liberty of the woman is at stake in a sense unique to the human condition and so unique to the law. The mother who carries a child to full term is subject to anxieties, to physical constraints, to pain that only she must bear. That these sacrifices have from the beginning of the human race been endured by woman with a pride that ennobles her in the eyes of others and gives to the infant a bond of love cannot alone be grounds for the State to insist that she make the sacrifice. Her suffering is too intimate and personal for the State to insist, without more, upon its own vision of the woman's role ….For years, Jehovah's Witnesses have posed a challenge to the medical profession. Bound by religious belief to refuse blood and blood products, they can frustrate physicians who, since World War II, have utilized transfusions when indicated in the course of treatment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Policing Pregnancy: The Law and Ethics of Obstetric Conflict. [REVIEW]Rodney Taylor - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 13 (1):38-38.
Jehovah's Witnesses-the blood transfusion taboo.R. Singelenberg - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):138-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
24 (#642,030)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Obstetric Autonomy and Informed Consent.Jessica Flanigan - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):225-244.
No More Jurisdiction Over Jehovah.Ann Dudley Goldblatt - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (2):190-193.

Add more citations