Philosophy of Science 79 (5):738-748 (2012)
|Abstract||Some philosophers of science – the present author included – appeal to fiction as an interpretation of the practice of modeling. This raises the specter of an incompatibility with realism, since fiction-making is essentially non-truth-regulated. I argue that the prima facie conflict can be resolved in two ways, each involving a distinct notion of fiction and a corresponding formulation of realism. The main goal of the paper is to describe these two packages. Toward the end I comment on how to choose among them.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alisa Bokulich (2012). Distinguishing Explanatory From Nonexplanatory Fictions. Philosophy of Science 79 (5):725-737.
Benjamin Schnieder & Tatjana von Solodkoff (2009). In Defence of Fictional Realism. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):138-149.
Allan Hazlett & Christy Mag Uidhir (2011). Unrealistic Fictions. American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):33--46.
Arthur Fine (2009). Science Fictions: Comment on Godfrey-Smith. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):117 - 125.
Reina Hayaki (2009). Fictions Within Fictions. Philosophical Studies 146 (3).
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). Sutrop on Literary Fiction-Making: Defending Currie. Disputatio (28):151-157.
Timothy Rayner (2003). Between Fiction and Reflection: Foucault and the Experience-Book. Continental Philosophy Review 36 (1):27-43.
Clark A. Chinn & William F. Brewer (1996). Mental Models in Data Interpretation. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):219.
R. A. Sharpe (2002). The Tale and the Teller. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (4):415-418.
David Davies (1987). Horwich on 'Semantic' and 'Metaphysical' Realism. Philosophy of Science 54 (4):539-557.
Roman Frigg (2010). Models and Fiction. Synthese 172 (2).
Added to index2012-06-22
Total downloads26 ( #47,569 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #2,059 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?