David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (3):289-297 (2008)
Many contemporary philosophers contend that a positive answer to Molyneux’s Question -- the question of whether a “man born blind and made to see” would be able to identify spatial figures, without touching them, on first viewing -- requires that there be a *rational connection* between the representations of those figures afforded by vision and by touch. This paper explores the question of what this could mean if the representations are non-discursive, or “pure recognitional” concepts, and argues that the most plausible answer to this question can be invoked to resolve analogous questions about the individuation of phenomenal concepts
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Janet Levin (2008). Molyneux's Question and the Individuation of Perceptual Concepts. Philosophical Studies 139 (1):1 - 28.
Brian Glenney (2012). Leibniz on Molyneux's Question. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):247-264.
John Schwenkler (2013). Do Things Look the Way They Feel? Analysis 73 (1):86-96.
Brian R. Glenney (2013). Philosophical Problems, Cluster Concepts, and the Many Lives of Molyneux's Question. Biology and Philosophy 28 (3):541-558.
John Campbell (2005). Information-Processing, Phenomenal Consciousness and Molyneux's Question. In José Luis Bermúdez (ed.), Thought, Reference, and Experience: Themes From the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Robert Hopkins (2005). Thomas Reid on Molyneux's Question. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):340-364.
Brian Glenney, Molyneux's Question. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Robert Hopkins (2005). Molyneux's Question. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):441-464.
Alessandra C. Jacomuzzi, Pietro Kobau & Nicola Bruno (2003). Molyneux's Question Redux. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (4):255-280.
Mike Bruno & Eric Mandelbaum (2010). Locke's Answer to Molyneux's Thought Experiment. History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (2):165-80.
Martha B. Bolton (1994). The Real Molyneux Question and the Basis of Locke's Answer. In G. A. J. Rogers (ed.), Locke's Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press
Cynthia Macdonald (2004). Mary Meets Molyneux: The Explanatory Gap and the Individuation of Phenomenal Concepts. Noûs 38 (3):503-24.
James Van Cleve (2007). Reid's Answer to Molyneux's Question. The Monist 90 (2):251-270.
Matti Sintonen (1984). On the Logic of Why-Questions. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:168 - 176.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads18 ( #141,475 of 1,699,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #128,702 of 1,699,442 )
How can I increase my downloads?