Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):485-499 (2008)
|Abstract||In this article, part of a symposium on David Miller's Global Justice and National Responsibility, I first focus on an area of disagreement: Miller‘s attempt to attribute to nations responsibility that I think ought to be generally attributed to states. I then sketch a theory that disregards nations more or less completely, and yet issues in a two-level theory like Miller‘s, sanctioning important differences between intrastate and interstate distribution. It is only like Miller‘s, because the distinction between states and nations is one with a very real difference indeed. Moreover, I think that Miller aims to build up the moral and historical prestige of the nation-state to make it a viable competitor with the claims of universal morality, whereas I will engage in a kind of deflation that teaches us not to expect contingent forms of political organization to instantiate great moral truths. But this results in an account that is perhaps more like his than either is like cosmopolitanism visions, whether egalitarian or libertarian.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rowan Cruft (forthcoming). Kamm and Miller on Rights' Compatibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.
Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (1999). Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Sahar Akhtar (2009). National Responsibility and Global Justice - David Miller. Ethics and International Affairs 23 (3):308-310.
Farid Abdel-Nour (2003). National Responsibility. Political Theory 31 (5):693-719.
David Miller (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford University Press.
Thom Brooks (2002). Cosmopolitanism and Distributing Responsibilities. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):92-97.
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2009). Responsible Nations: Miller on National Responsibility. Ethics and Global Politics 2 (2).
Christian Barry & Pablo Gilabert (2008). Does Global Egalitarianism Provide an Impractical and Unattractive Ideal of Justice? International Affairs 84 (5):1025-1039.
John Pearson (2011). National Responsibility, Global Justice and Exploitation: A Preliminary Analysis. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):321-335.
Roland Pierik (2008). Collective Responsibility and National Responsibility. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (4):465-483.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #160,284 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?