David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy of Education 44 (1):1-21 (2010)
Historians typically tell stories about the past, but how are we to understand the epistemic status of those narratives? This problem is particularly pressing for history education, which seeks guidance not only on the question of which narrative to teach but also more fundamentally on the question of the goals of instruction in history. This article explores the nature of historical narrative, first, by engaging with the seminal work of Hayden White, and second, by developing the critique of White by David Carr. The picture of historical inquiry that emerges is one in which the fundamental cognitive activity is one of negotiating among narratives. Students, like historians, like any of us, come to the work of historical inquiry in possession of prior narratives, which are then thrown into an encounter with other narratives of varying size and scope. Good historians enact the negotiation among narratives responsibly and well, demonstrating the virtues of historical interpretation. History education, therefore, ought to help students improve their historical interpretations at the same time as it fosters those qualities that make them good interpreters
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
F. Ankersmit (1988). Historical Representation. History and Theory 27 (3):205-228.
F. R. Ankersmit (2003). Danto, History, and the Tragedy of Human Existence. History and Theory 42 (3):291–304.
Guy Axtell (ed.) (2000). Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
David Carr (1986). Narrative and the Real World: An Argument for Continuity. History and Theory 25 (2):117-131.
David Carr (2008). 1. Narrative Explanation and its Malcontents. History and Theory 47 (1):19–30.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen Turner (2011). Collingwood and Weber Vs. Mink: History After the Cognitive Turn. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):230-260.
Nancy S. Jecker (2005). Health Care Reform: What History Doesn't Teach. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (4):277-305.
Axel Seemann (2011). The Role of Joint Experience in Historical Narratives. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):201-229.
M. Norton Wise (2011). Science as (Historical) Narrative. Erkenntnis 75 (3):349-376.
Leonard Mendes Marsak (ed.) (1977). The Nature of Historical Inquiry. R. E. Krieger Publishing Company.
C. Behan McCullagh (2000). The Structure and Objectivity of Historical Narratives. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:145-158.
Thomas D. Fallace (2010). John Dewey on History Education and the Historical Method. Education and Culture 26 (2):20-35.
Larry Arnhart (2007). The Behavioral Sciences Are Historical Sciences of Emergent Complexity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):18-19.
Karsten R. Stueber (2008). Theories Explain, and so Do Historical Narratives: But There Are Differences. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):237-243.
Added to index2010-03-19
Total downloads21 ( #125,645 of 1,700,301 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,935 of 1,700,301 )
How can I increase my downloads?