David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):37 - 49 (2006)
Nuclear power has never been free from the stifling involvement of government. Heavy regulation has reduced the ability of entrepreneurs to develop and provide new means for the generation of energy using nuclear fuel. The strict parameters dictated by government officials are based upon outdated technology, an improper regulatory philosophy, and preclude innovation in nuclear power generation. Anti-market environmentalists misunderstand the implications of a free market in nuclear power and argue against it based on problems that are actually caused by government involvement. Our position is neither for nor against nuclear power. We advocate a hands-off policy where the nuclear industry is left to its own devices, free from governmental regulations and subsidies: free to succeed or fail on its own. Thus, our position is neither right-wing conservative (removing regulations), nor left-wing liberal (removing subsidies). Very much to the contrary of both positions, we propose a free-market in nuclear power.
|Keywords||nuclear energy Price Anderson subsidies government interference NIMBY|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Walter Block (2002). A Critique of the Legal and Philosophical Case for Rent Control. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (1):75 - 90.
Walter Block (1979). Free Market Transportation: Denationalizing The Roads. Journal of Libertarian Studies 3 (2):209-238.
Walter Block & Matthew Block (2005). Private Parks and Walkways Under Free Enterprise: A Geographical Economic Analysis. Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (2):201-208.
N. Kinsella (1996). New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory. Journal of Libertarian Studies 12 (2):313-326.
Citations of this work BETA
Salla Laasonen, Martin Fougère & Arno Kourula (2012). Dominant Articulations in Academic Business and Society Discourse on NGO–Business Relations: A Critical Assessment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):521-545.
Similar books and articles
William Beaver (1994). Nuclear Nightmares in the Philippines. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):271 - 279.
Gilles D. Hurteau (1989). Global Peace as a Professional Concern, II. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):173 - 175.
Robert E. Goodin (1985). Disarming Nuclear Apologists. Inquiry 28 (1-4):153 – 176.
Hugh Beach (1983). Where Does the Nuclear-Free Path Lead? In Francis Bridger (ed.), The Cross and the Bomb: Christian Ethics and the Nuclear Debate. Mowbray
Kristin Sharon Shrader-Frechette (2009). Data Trimming, Nuclear Emissions, and Climate Change. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):19-23.
Sheila Jasanoff & Sang-Hyun Kim (2009). Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47 (2):119-146.
Mats Andren (2012). An Uncomfortable Responsibility: Ethics and Nuclear Waste. The European Legacy 17 (1):71 - 82.
Paul B. Thompson (1984). Need and Safety: The Nuclear Power Debate. Environmental Ethics 6 (1):57-69.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #124,241 of 1,938,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #100,409 of 1,938,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?