David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Leibniz Review 17:61-106 (2007)
What is Leibniz’s argument for simple substances? I propose that it is an extension of his prior argument for incorporeal forms as principles of unity for individual corporeal substances. The extension involves seeing the hylomorphic analysis of corporeal substances as implying a resolution of matter into forms, and this seems to demand that forms, which are themselves simple, be the only elements of things. The argument for simples thus presupposes the existence of corporeal substances as a key premise. Yet a theory of simple substances as the elements of things threatens to preclude the existence of corporeal substances for Leibniz, and the extension of the argument for forms into an argument for simples is not cogent. If nothing else rides on the simplicity of individual substances, then perhaps instead of being its most fundamental tenet, the doctrine of simples—the monadology—is something that over-extends and destabilizes Leibniz’s metaphysics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Brandon C. Look (2010). Leibniz's Metaphysics and Metametaphysics: Idealism, Realism, and the Nature of Substance. Philosophy Compass 5 (11):871-879.
Tyler Doggett (2010). Why Leibniz Thinks Descartes Was Wrong and the Scholastics Were Right. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):1 - 18.
Tyler Doggett (2010). Why Leibniz Thinks Descartes Was Wrong and the Scholastics Were Right. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):1-18.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Garber (2009). Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. Oxford University Press.
Nicholas Okrent (2000). Leibniz on Substance and God in “That a Most Perfect Being Is Possible”. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):79-93.
Catherine Jack Deavel (2003). Unity and Primary Substance for Aristotle. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:159-172.
Hye-Kyung Kim (2007). Aristotle on Substance and Unity. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:79-91.
Brandon Look (2000). Leibniz and the Substance of the Vinculum Substantiale. Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2):203-220.
Samuel Levey (2011). On Two Theories of Substance in Leibniz: Critical Notice of Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. Philosophical Review 120 (2):285 - 320.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #118,676 of 1,937,482 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #160,501 of 1,937,482 )
How can I increase my downloads?