David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):258 - 278 (1985)
In response to criticisms of his "Ambiguity in Moral Choice", Richard McCormick developed, in "Commentary on the Commentaries," an alternative view on proportionate reason. I interpret McCormick's view in terms of what I call "the undermining principle," "the theory of associated goods," "the necessity principle," and "the liberty principle." I argue that the first two are the heart of the theory and link McCormick's view to that of Peter Knauer. I then show that McCormick's view suffers from several problems, including a lack of argumentation for his central undermining principle, and counterexamples to his necessity and liberty principles.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Frederick S. Carney (1978). On McCormick and Teleological Morality. Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):81 - 107.
Richard McCormick (2000). Ambiguity in Moral Choice. In Christopher Robert Kaczor (ed.), Religious Studies. Marquette University Press 252-253.
James Gaffney (1976). The Over-Extended Principle of Totality and Some Underlying Issues. Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (2):259-267.
Richard A. McCormick (1989). The Critical Calling: Reflections on Moral Dilemmas Since Vatican Ii. Georgetown University Press.
Walter Ott (2009). Remarks on McCormick's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):475-476.
Peter McCormick (2004). Warfare, Reason, and Moral Truths. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 8 (2):267-274.
O. Bayer (1988). A Response To Richard McCormick. Studies in Christian Ethics 1 (1):30-32.
J. B. Tubbs (1996). Moral Epistemology in Richard McCormick's Ethics. Christian Bioethics 2 (1):114-126.
John A. Robertson (1991). What We May Do with Preembryos: A Response to Richard A. McCormick. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1 (4):293-302.
Matt McCormick (2005). Kant's Theory of Mind in the Critique of Pure Reason's Subjective Deduction. Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (3):353–381.
Richard Holmes (1992). Fictions, Philosophies, and the Problems of Poetics Peter J. McCormick Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988, Xvi + 351 P., $42.50, $15.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 31 (01):173-.
P. A. Clark (2008). Richard McCormick, SJ, and Dual Epistemology. Christian Bioethics 14 (3):236-271.
Mark T. Nelson (1996). The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Moral Argument. Religious Studies 32 (1):15-26.
Richard A. McCormick (1992). A Theological Perspective. Ethics and Behavior 2 (2):130 – 131.
Richard A. McCormick (1978). Freedman on the Rights of the Voiceless. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 3 (3):211-221.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads4 ( #555,172 of 1,796,209 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,533 of 1,796,209 )
How can I increase my downloads?