David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):299-301 (2004)
How can one conceive of the neuronal implementation of the processing model we proposed in our target article? In his commentary (Pulvermüller 1999, reprinted here in this issue), Pulvermüller makes various proposals concerning the underlying neural mechanisms and their potential localizations in the brain. These proposals demonstrate the compatibility of our processing model and current neuroscience. We add further evidence on details of localization based on a recent meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of word production (Indefrey & Levelt 2000). We also express some minor disagreements with respect to Pulvermüller's interpretation of the “lemma” notion, and concerning his neural modeling of phonological code retrieval. Branigan & Pickering discuss important aspects of syntactic encoding, which was not the topic of the target article. We discuss their well-taken proposal that multiple syntactic frames for a single verb lemma are represented as independent nodes, which can be shared with other verbs, such as accounting for syntactic priming in speech production. We also discuss how, in principle, the alternative multiple-frame-multiple-lemma account can be tested empirically. The available evidence does not seem to support that account. Footnotes1 BBS Note: The original manuscript of this Response article was received on January 14, 2000.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marco Zorzi & Gabriella Vigliocco (1999). Compositional Semantics and the Lemma Dilemma. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):60-61.
Ralph-Axel Müller (2006). Blackboards in the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):81-81.
Willem J. M. Levelt, Ardi Roelofs & Antje S. Meyer (1999). A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):1-38.
Gerard Kempen (2000). Could Grammatical Encoding and Grammatical Decoding Be Subserved by the Same Processing Module? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):38-39.
J. D. Jescheniak & H. Schriefers (1999). Strictly Discrete Serial Stages and Contextual Appropriateness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):47-48.
David Reitter, Frank Keller & Johanna D. Moore (2011). A Computational Cognitive Model of Syntactic Priming. Cognitive Science 35 (4):587-637.
Friedemann PulvermÜ & Ller (1999). Lexical Access as a Brain Mechanism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):52-54.
Willem J. M. Levelt, Ardi Roelofs & Antje S. Meyer (1999). Multiple Perspectives on Word Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):61-69.
Friedemann Pulvermüller (2004). Lexical Access as a Brain Mechanism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):297-299.
Holly P. Branigan & Martin J. Pickering (2004). Syntactic Representation in the Lemma Stratum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):296-297.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #151,097 of 1,725,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,716 of 1,725,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?