David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):93-142 (2001)
My essay explores the connections between Spinoza’s theory of biblical interpretation and his conception of prophecy, linking the two through what he calls “moral certainty.” The question of what prophecy conveys is connected to the question of how to read Scripture because readers are in a similar position to both the prophets, who attain sure knowledge of some matter revealed by God, and the audience of prophecy, who have access to this knowledge only through faith. Like prophets, readers are interpreters of something that can not be known by way of reason alone; hence the effort to secure certainty involves factors other than purely rational ones (the history of the text, for readers; a vivid imagination, signs, and virtue for the prophet). But like the prophet’s audience, the knowledge of texts that we can attain is not always “sure,” since texts “transcend” us in a certain sense. That is, they introduce novelties---laws, customs, histories---that we wouldn’t know without reading them, and we therefore have to take their authors, prophets in this case, at their word-as it were, on faith. While most of the focus on Spinoza’s concept of biblical interpretation has centered on his maxim that “the method of interpreting Scripture is no different from the method of interpreting Nature,” I hold that it is just as crucial to investigate his claims concerning the nature of prophecy, and in particular to allow prophetic knowledge to shed light on Spinoza’s concepts of words, history, and the corruption and incorruptibility of texts
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
C. M. Lorkowski (2009). The Miracle of Moses. Heythrop Journal 50 (2):181-188.
Michael Della Rocca (2008). Spinoza. Routledge.
James S. Preus (2001). Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge University Press.
Nancy Levene (2004). Spinoza's Revelation: Religion, Democracy, and Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Eric Schliesser (2011). Spinoza on the Politics of PhilosophicalUnderstanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser Angels and Philosophers: With a New Interpretation of Spinoza's Common Notions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):497-518.
Andrea Sangiacomo (2011). Adequate Knowledge and Bodily Complexity in Spinoza’s Account of Consciousness. Methodus 6:77-104.
Robert D. Lane (ed.) (1994). Reading the Bible: Intention, Text, Interpretation. University Press of America.
Aaron Garrett (2003). Meaning in Spinoza's Method. Cambridge University Press.
Alexander Pruss (2007). Prophecy Without Middle Knowledge. Faith and Philosophy 24 (4):433-457.
Heidi M. Ravven (2001). The Garden of Eden. Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):3-51.
Colin Marshall (2012). Spinoza on Destroying Passions with Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):139-160.
Lorenzo Vinciguerra (2012). Mark, Image, Sign: A Semiotic Approach to Spinoza. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):130-144.
R. J. (2003). Nature's Metabolism: On Eating in Derrida, Agamben, and Spinoza. Research in Phenomenology 33 (1):186-217.
Michael A. Rosenthal (2001). Spinoza's Dogmas of the Universal Faith and the Problem of Religion. Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):53-72.
Charles Huenemann (ed.) (2008). Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads15 ( #227,403 of 1,790,292 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #200,312 of 1,790,292 )
How can I increase my downloads?