Robert J. Levine, Carolyn M. Mazure, Philip E. Rubin, Barry R. Schaller, John L. Young & Judith B. Gordon
American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):24-30 (2011)
|Abstract||This article argues that we could improve the design of research protocols by developing an awareness of and a responsiveness to the social contexts of all the actors in the research enterprise, including subjects, investigators, sponsors, and members of the community in which the research will be conducted. ?Social context? refers to the settings in which the actors are situated, including, but not limited to, their social, economic, political, cultural, and technological features. The utility of thinking about social contexts is introduced and exemplified by the presentation of a hypothetical case in which one central issue is limitation of the probability of injury to subjects by selection of individuals who are not expected to live long enough for the known risks of the study to become manifest as harms. Benefits of such considerations may include enhanced subject satisfaction and cooperation, community acceptance, and improved data quality, among other desirable consequences|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert J. Levine, Judith B. Gordon, Carolyn M. Mazure, Philip E. Rubin, Barry R. Schaller & John L. Young (2011). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Social Contexts Influence Ethical Considerations of Research”. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):W1-W2.
James C. Wimbush (1999). The Effect of Cognitive Moral Development and Supverisory Influence on Subordinates' Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 18 (4):383 - 395.
Allan J. Kimmel, N. Craig Smith & Jill Gabrielle Klein (2011). Ethical Decision Making and Research Deception in the Behavioral Sciences: An Application of Social Contract Theory. Ethics and Behavior 21 (3):222 - 251.
John D. Pringle & Donald C. Cole (2009). Health Research in Complex Emergencies: A Humanitarian Imperative. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):115-123.
Martin Thrupp & Ruth Lupton (2006). Taking School Contexts More Seriously: The Social Justice Challenge. British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (3):308 - 328.
Danielle Beu & M. Ronald Buckley (2001). The Hypothesized Relationship Between Accountability and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (1):57 - 73.
Dag Elgesem (2002). What is Special About the Ethical Issues in Online Research? Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):195-203.
Anne Pirrie, James MacAllister & Gale Macleod (2012). Taking Flight: Trust, Ethics and the Comfort of Strangers. Ethics and Education 7 (1):33 - 44.
James B. DeConinck & William F. Lewis (1997). The Influence of Deontological and Teleological Considerations and Ethical Climate on Sales Managers' Intentions to Reward or Punish Sales Force Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):497-506.
Sven Ove Hansson (2011). Do We Need a Special Ethics for Research? Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):21-29.
Kumju Hwang, William Young, Seonaidh McDonald & Caroline Oates (2005). Ethical Consumers' Brand Choice on Technology-Based Products. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:314-319.
Craig V. VanSandt, Jon M. Shepard & Stephen M. Zappe (2006). An Examination of the Relationship Between Ethical Work Climate and Moral Awareness. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (4):409 - 432.
Joseph G. P. Paolillo & Scott J. Vitell (2002). An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Selected Personal, Organizational and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 35 (1):65 - 74.
Daniel A. Griffith (2008). Ethical Considerations in Geographic Research: What Especially Graduate Students Need to Know. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):237 – 252.
Added to index2011-05-01
Total downloads2 ( #245,680 of 722,708 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,708 )
How can I increase my downloads?