Self-determination, non-domination, and federalism
Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 60-78 (2008)
| Abstract | This article summarizes the theory of federalism as non-domination Iris Marion Young began to develop in her final years, a theory of self-government that tried to recognize interconnectedness. Levy also poses an objection to that theory: non-domination cannot do the work Young needed of it, because it is a theory about the merits of decisions not about jurisdiction over them. The article concludes with an attempt to give Young the last word. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,882 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesM. D. Harbour (2012). Non-Domination and Pure Negative Liberty. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):186-205.
Amy L. Goff-Yates (2000). Karen Warren and the Logic of Domination: A Defense. Environmental Ethics 22 (2):169-181.
Jonathan Bowman (2007). Challenging Habermas' Response to the European Union Democratic Deficit. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):736-755.
Mark Rigstad (2011). Republicanism and Geopolitical Domination. Journal of Political Power 4 (2):279-300.
Iris Marion Young (1984). Marxism and Domination. Environmental Ethics 6 (2):185-191.
Lena Halldenius (1998). Non-Domination and Egalitarian Welfare Politics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (3):335-353.
Ranjoo Seodu Herr (2008). Politics of Difference and Nationalism: On Iris Young's Global Vision. Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 39-59.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #79,731 of 556,914 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,914 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
