David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (4):367-379 (2002)
In this short paper I begin by underlining the sense in which my intentional-historical theory of art, first proposed in 1979, attributes to art a certain irreducible historicality. I next defend the theory, in broad outline, against a number of objections that have been raised against it in the past ten years. I conclude with some remarks on the similarities and differences between ordinary artefact concepts and the concept of an artwork.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Berys Gaut (2005). The Cluster Account of Art Defended. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):273-288.
Christy Mag Uidhir (2009). Why Pornography Can't Be Art. Philosophy and Literature 33 (1):pp. 193-203.
Peter Goldie (2007). Towards a Virtue Theory of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):372-387.
Aaron Meskin (2007). The Cluster Account of Art Reconsidered. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):388-400.
Jerrold Levinson (2006). Contemplating Art: Essays in Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2007). Art Without ‘Art’. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):1-15.
Richard Shusterman (2003). Entertainment: A Question for Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):289-307.
Christy Mag Uidhir & P. D. Magnus (2011). Art Concept Pluralism. Metaphilosophy 42 (1-2):83-97.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #43,180 of 1,096,702 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,267 of 1,096,702 )
How can I increase my downloads?