Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 105 (2):107-127 (2001)
|Abstract||Libertarians like Robert Kane believe that indeterminism is necessaryfor free will. They think this in part because they hold both (1) thatmy being the ultimate cause of at least part of myself is necessary forfree will and (2) that indeterminism is necessary for this ``ultimateself-causation''. But seductive and intuitive as this ``USCLibertarianism'' may sound, it is untenable. In the end, nometaphysically coherent (not to mention empirically valid) conception ofultimate self-causation is available. So the basic intuition motivatingthe USC Libertarian is ultimately impossible to fulfill|
|Keywords||Causation Free Will Indeterminism Libertarianism Metaphysics Kane, R|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert A. Larmer (1986). Free Will, Hegemony and Neurophysiological Indeterminism. Philosophia 16 (August):177-189.
Christopher Evan Franklin (2011). The Problem of Enhanced Control. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):687 - 706.
E. J. Coffman (2004). On Making an Effort. Philosophical Papers 33 (1):11-21.
M. Almeida & M. Bernstein (2003). Lucky Libertarianism. Philosophical Studies 22 (2):93-119.
Alfred C. Ewing (1951). Indeterminism. Review of Metaphysics 5 (December):199-222.
Roksana Alavi (2005). Robert Kane, Free Will and Neuro-Indeterminism. Philo 8 (2):95-108.
Robert H. Kane (2004). Agency, Responsibility, and Indeterminism: Reflections on Libertarian Theories of Free Will. In Ted Honderich (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Bradford Book/MIT Press.
Robert F. Allen (2005). Free Will and Indeterminism: Robert Kane's Libertarianism. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:341-355.
Roksana Alavi (2005). Robert Kane, Free Will, and Neuro-Indeterminism. Philo 8 (2):95-108.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #60,317 of 739,174 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,174 )
How can I increase my downloads?