Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 145 (3):351 - 362 (2009)
|Abstract||Materialism, as traditionally conceived, has a contingent side and a necessary side. The necessity of materialism is reflected by the metaphysics of realization, while its contingency is a matter of accepting the possibility of Cartesian worlds, worlds in which our minds are roughly as Descartes describes them. In this paper we argue that the necessity and the contingency of materialism are in conflict. In particular, we claim that if mental properties are realized by physical properties in the actual world, Cartesian worlds are impossible.|
|Keywords||Materialism Brute necessity Realization Dispositions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gerard O'Brien & Jonathan Opie (1999). A Defense of Cartesian Materialism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):939-63.
David Lewis (1983). New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (December):343-377.
George A. Sher (1977). Kripke, Cartesian Intuitions, and Materialism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):227-38.
Paul F. Snowdon (1989). On Formulating Materialism and Dualism. In John Heil (ed.), Cause, Mind, and Reality: Essays Honoring C. B. Martin. Kluwer.
Michael E. Levin (1981). Phenomenal Properties. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (March):42-58.
Stewart Duncan (2013). Materialism. In S. A. Lloyd (ed.), Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes. Continuum.
Lynne Baker (2011). Christian Materialism in a Scientific Age. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):47-59.
Jonathan Opie (1999). A Defense of Cartesian Materialism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):939 - 963.
Joseph Levine (1983). Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (October):354-61.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads110 ( #6,506 of 739,100 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,100 )
How can I increase my downloads?