Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):607-617 (1997)
|Abstract||This article considers some recent objections to reliabilism, particularly those of Susan Haack in Evidence and Inquiry. Haack complains that reliabilism solves the "ratification" problem trivially, making it analytic that evidence relates to truth; this paper defends an analytic solution to this problem. It argues as well that reliabilism is not tacitly committed to "evidentialism." Familiar counterexamples to and repairs of reliabilism are reviewed, with an eye to finding their rationale. Finally, it suggests that the underlying dispute between reliabilism and its critics is the existence of a priori relations between evidence and hypotheses|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ernest Sosa (1992). Generic Reliabilism and Virtue Epistemology. Philosophical Issues 2:79-92.
Justin P. McBrayer (2007). Process Reliabilism, Virtue Reliabilism, and the Value of Knowledge. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):289-302.
John Greco (1999). Agent Reliabilism. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):273-296.
Steven Miller & Marcel Fredericks (2002). Reliabilism 'Naturalized'. Social Epistemology 16 (4):367 – 376.
James R. Beebe (2006). Reliabilism and Deflationism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):495 – 510.
Alvin Goldman, Reliabilism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Peter Baumann (2009). Reliabilism—Modal, Probabilistic or Contextualist. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):77-89.
Michael Levin (1997). You Can Always Count on Reliabilism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):607 - 617.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #133,587 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?