David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 54 (1):1-8 (2009)
In his great poem, Parmenides uses an argument by elimination to select the correct "way of inquiry" from a pool of two, the ways of is and of is not , joined later by a third, "mixed" way of is and is not . Parmenides' first two ways are soon given modal upgrades - is becomes cannot not be , and is not becomes necessarily is not (B2, 3-6) - and these are no longer contradictories of one another. And is the common view right, that Parmenides rejects the "mixed" way because it is a contradiction? I argue that the modal upgrades are the product of an illicit modal shift. This same shift, built into two Exclusion Arguments, gives Parmenides a novel argument to show that the "mixed" way fails. Given the independent failure of the way of is not , Parmenides' argument by elimination is complete.
|Keywords||SCOPE CONTRADICTORIES PARMENIDES MODAL FALLACY ARGUMENT BY ELIMINATION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas M. Robinson (2010). Parmenides †(A.H.) Coxon, (R.) McKirahan (Edd., Trans.) The Fragments of Parmenides. A Critical Text with Introduction and Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary. Pp. Xvi + 461. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2009. Cased, £52.50, US$87. ISBN: 978-1-93097267-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (02):345-347.
John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras Betwixt Parmenides and Plato. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
Frank A. Lewis (1979). Parmenides on Separation and the Knowability of the Forms: Plato Parmenides 133a Ff. Philosophical Studies 35 (2):105 - 127.
S. Klitenic Wear (2011). The One in Syrianus Teachings on the Parmenides: Syrianus on Parm., 137d and 139a1. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):58-84.
M. R. Wright (1980). Hesiod and Parmenides Maja E. Pellikaan-Engel: Hesiod and Parmenides. A New View on Their Cosmologies and on Parmenides'Proem. Pp. 110; 6 Figures. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1978. Paper, 30 Sw. Frs. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 30 (01):46-47.
Mohan Matthen (1986). A Note on Parmenides' Denial of Past and Future. Dialogue 25 (03):553-.
J. Tate (1941). Plato and Parmenides Francis Macdonald Cornford: Plato and Parmenides. Parmenides' Way of Truth and Plato's Parmenides Translated with an Introduction and a Running Commentary. Pp. Xvii+251. London: Kegan Paul, 1939. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (02):76-78.
John Anderson Palmer (2009). Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #71,445 of 1,938,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #290,621 of 1,938,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?