David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 54 (1):1-8 (2009)
In his great poem, Parmenides uses an argument by elimination to select the correct "way of inquiry" from a pool of two, the ways of is and of is not , joined later by a third, "mixed" way of is and is not . Parmenides' first two ways are soon given modal upgrades - is becomes cannot not be , and is not becomes necessarily is not (B2, 3-6) - and these are no longer contradictories of one another. And is the common view right, that Parmenides rejects the "mixed" way because it is a contradiction? I argue that the modal upgrades are the product of an illicit modal shift. This same shift, built into two Exclusion Arguments, gives Parmenides a novel argument to show that the "mixed" way fails. Given the independent failure of the way of is not , Parmenides' argument by elimination is complete.
|Keywords||SCOPE CONTRADICTORIES PARMENIDES MODAL FALLACY ARGUMENT BY ELIMINATION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. Tate (1941). Plato and Parmenides Francis Macdonald Cornford: Plato and Parmenides. Parmenides' Way of Truth and Plato's Parmenides Translated with an Introduction and a Running Commentary. Pp. Xvii+251. London: Kegan Paul, 1939. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (02):76-78.
Mohan Matthen (1986). A Note on Parmenides' Denial of Past and Future. Dialogue 25 (03):553-.
M. R. Wright (1980). Hesiod and Parmenides Maja E. Pellikaan-Engel: Hesiod and Parmenides. A New View on Their Cosmologies and on Parmenides'Proem. Pp. 110; 6 Figures. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1978. Paper, 30 Sw. Frs. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 30 (01):46-47.
S. Klitenic Wear (2011). The One in Syrianus Teachings on the Parmenides: Syrianus on Parm., 137d and 139a1. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):58-84.
Frank A. Lewis (1979). Parmenides on Separation and the Knowability of the Forms: Plato Parmenides 133a Ff. Philosophical Studies 35 (2):105 - 127.
John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras Betwixt Parmenides and Plato. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
Thomas M. Robinson (2010). Parmenides †(A.H.) Coxon, (R.) McKirahan (Edd., Trans.) The Fragments of Parmenides. A Critical Text with Introduction and Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary. Pp. Xvi + 461. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2009. Cased, £52.50, US$87. ISBN: 978-1-93097267-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (02):345-347.
John Anderson Palmer (2009). Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #28,759 of 1,089,156 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,156 )
How can I increase my downloads?