Putnam's paradox
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):221 – 236 (1984)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesC. J. G. Wright (2000). Cogency and Question-Begging: Some Reflections on McKinsey's Paradox and Putnam's Proof. Philosophical Issues 10 (s1):140-63.
Frederick Kroon (2001). Chambers on Putnam's Paradox. Mind 110 (439):703-708.
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1997). Elgin on Lewis's Putnam's Paradox. Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):85-93.
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1997). Elgin on Lewis's Putnam's Paradox. Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):85 - 93.
Bas C. van Fraassen (1997). Elgin on Lewis's Putnam's Paradox. Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):85-93.
Jürgen Dümont (1999). Putnam's Model-Theoretic Argument(S). A Detailed Reconstruction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30 (2):341-364.
Michael Hallett (1994). Putnam and the Skolem Paradox. In Peter Clark & Bob Hale (eds.), Reading Putnam. Blackwell.
Bas C. van Fraassen (1997). Putnam's Paradox: Metaphysical Realism Revamped and Evaded. Philosophical Perspectives 11:17-42.
Timothy Chambers (2000). A Quick Reply to Putnam's Paradox. Mind 109 (434):195-197.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads662 ( #49 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #3,189 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
