David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):559-577 (2005)
The four tenets of the Strong Program are compatible with a scientific realism founded on an externalist epistemology. Such an epistemology allows that appropriate norms of rationality may differ from time to time, and from community to community, and thereby enables the realist to embrace strong forms of the ‘symmetry principle’. It also suggests a fruitful collaborative research program in externalist social epistemology. Some of what the Edinburgh School says about truth can also be accepted. But the realist should reject the School's argument for the claim that there is no distinction between being rational and being locally accepted as rational, which seems to rest on a kind of epistemological internalism. Introducing the Strong Program Realism and the four tenets A stronger reading of symmetry Conflict and cooperation A note on discovery and justification Relativism and realism Truth Points of contention: the restriction of explanatory contrasts Points of contention: standards of rationality.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tim Lewens (2012). The Darwinian View of Culture. Biology and Philosophy 27 (5):745-753.
Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen (2011). I Am Knowledge. Get Me Out of Here! On Localism and the Universality of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):590-601.
N. Tosh (2006). Science, Truth and History, Part II. Metaphysical Bolt-Holds for the Sociology of Scientific Knowlege? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38 (1):185-209.
Similar books and articles
Janet Folina (1995). Putnam, Realism and Truth. Synthese 103 (2):141--52.
Jeff Kochan (2010). Contrastive Explanation and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Social Studies of Science 40 (1):127-44.
Arthur Fine (1991). Piecemeal Realism. Philosophical Studies 61 (1-2):79 - 96.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1991). Realism, Relativism, and Constructivism. Synthese 89 (1):135 - 162.
Mark T. Nelson (2006). Moral Realism and Program Explanation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):417 – 428.
William S. Robinson (1996). Mild Realism, Causation, and Folk Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 8 (2):167-87.
Paul Faulkner (2004). Relativism and Our Warrant for Scientific Theories. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):259 – 269.
Jeff Kochan (2008). Realism, Reliabilism, and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):21 – 38.
Graham Oddie (1986). The Poverty of the Popperian Program for Truthlikeness. Philosophy of Science 53 (2):163-178.
Tamas Demeter (2009). Can the Strong Program Be Generalized? Review of Sociology 15 (1):5-16.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #59,060 of 1,098,981 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #114,620 of 1,098,981 )
How can I increase my downloads?