REVIEW: Frederick Grinnell, The Everyday Practice of Science: Where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Spontaneous Generations 6 (1):242-244 (2012)
Frederick Grinnell’s “Everyday Practice of Science” is an ambitious attempt to survey the methodological issues facing practicing scientists. His examples and anecdotes are mainly drawn from his own field of biochemistry, which he argues is representative of the scientific method in general because, quoting Nobel Laureate Sir Peter Medawar, “Biologists work very close to the frontier between bewilderment and understanding.”(p.4) Grinnell’s goal is to explore the ambiguity and messiness of actual scientific practice, but not with an eye to undermine its credibility. Rather, he tries to show how the day-to-day practice of science functions to generate reliable hypotheses from the complexity of reality
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Frederick Grinnell (2009). Everyday Practice of Science: Where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic. Oxford University Press.
Frederick Grinnell (2013). Research Integrity and Everyday Practice of Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):685-701.
Frederick Grinnell (1995). COSEPUP on Responsible Science. Biology and Philosophy 10 (2):229-233.
Frederick Grinnell (1996). Publishing Science Responsibly. Biology and Philosophy 11 (1):121-125.
Frederick Grinnell (1987). Responses to 'Pathologies of Science'. Social Epistemology 1 (3):249 – 281.
Frederick Grinnell (1992). The Scientific Attitude, 2nd Edition. Guilford Publications.
Frederick Grinnell (1999). Ambiguity, Trust, and the Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):205-214.
Frederick Grinnell (1999). Are Scientific Papers Examples of Rhetoric? Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):487-488.
Tibor R. Machan (2003). Objectivity: Recovering Determinate Reality in Philosophy, Science, and Everyday Life. Ashgate.
Linnell Secomb (2008). Rrapping Irigaray : Flesh, Passion, World. In Nicole Anderson & Katrina Schlunke (eds.), Cultural Theory in Everyday Practice. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.) (2004). Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge.
Malcolm Williams (2006). Can Scientists Be Objective? Social Epistemology 20 (2):163 – 180.
Richard Dien Winfield (2002). Objectivity in Logic and Nature. The Owl of Minerva 34 (1):77-89.
Frederick Grinnell (1983). The Problem of Intersubjectivity: A Comparison of Martin Buber and Alfred Schutz. [REVIEW] Human Studies 6 (1):185 - 195.
Frederick Grinnell (2004). Subject Vulnerability: The Precautionary Principle of Human Research. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):72-74.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-04
Total downloads6 ( #193,403 of 1,096,517 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #35,870 of 1,096,517 )
How can I increase my downloads?