Radical interpretation

Synthese 27 (July-August):331-344 (1974)
What knowledge would suffice to yield an interpretation of an arbitrary utterance of a language when such knowledge is based on evidence plausibly available to a nonspeaker of that language? it is argued that it is enough to know (1) a theory of truth for the language and (2) that the theory satisfies tarski's 'convention t' (modified to apply to natural language) and (3) that it gives an optimal fit (in a sense described) to data about sentences held true, Under specified conditions, By native speakers
Keywords Belief  Desire  Epistemology  Interpretation  Meaning  Person
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,248
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Donald Davidson (1963). Actions, Reasons, and Causes. Journal of Philosophy 60 (23):685-700.
H. P. Grice (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
David Lewis (1970). How to Define Theoretical Terms. Journal of Philosophy 67 (13):427-446.
Citations of this work BETA

View all 39 citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

233 ( #3,557 of 1,699,834 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

23 ( #31,130 of 1,699,834 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.