Taking adjudication seriously
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (4):377 – 387 (1980)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFred D'agostino (1989). Adjudication as an Epistemological Concept. Synthese 79 (2):231 - 256.
Gregory Mellema (1988). Groups, Responsibility, and Risk Taking in Business Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):593 - 603.
J. R. Dinwiddy (1989). Adjudication Under Bentham's Pannomion. Utilitas 1 (02):283-.
Brian Bix (2008). Legal Philosophy in America. In C. J. Misak (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Nick Jardine (2008). Explanatory Genealogies and Historical Testimony. Episteme 5 (2):pp. 160-179.
Ralf Poscher (2009). Insights, Errors and Self-Misconceptions of the Theory of Principles. Ratio Juris 22 (4):425-454.
Steven J. Burton (1992). Judging in Good Faith. Cambridge University Press.
William Lucy (1999). Understanding and Explaining Adjudication. Oxford University Press.
Stephanie R. Lewis (1983). Adjudication and Fairness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (2):160 – 171.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,739 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
