Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):49-66 (2000)
|Abstract||This article examines the interpretive dimensions of human action. Although it takes the reflexive sociology of Pierre Bourdieu as its starting point, the article attempts to develop a more robust hermeneutical account of the reflexivity of social actors and those who study them than Bourdieu himself has considered. It is argued that interpretation is best understood not as the homologous expression of inculcated structures but rather as context-sensitive and reflexively context-transforming actionor what the author wishes to characterize, respectively, as first- and second-order thematizations of embeddedness. The article concludes by contrasting the author's position with the thick description of Clifford Geertz.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Eastwood (2007). Bourdieu, Flaubert, and the Sociology of Literature. Sociological Theory 25 (2):149 - 169.
Dave Elder-Vass (2007). Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an Emergentist Theory of Action. Sociological Theory 25 (4):325 - 346.
Jeannine Verdès-Leroux (2001). Deconstructing Pierre Bourdieu: Against Sociological Terrorism From the Left. Algora.
Loic J. D. Wacquant (1989). Towards a Reflexive Sociology: A Workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory 7 (1):26-63.
Malcolm Ashmore (1989). The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
Stephen Turner (1991). Social Constructionism and Social Theory. Sociological Theory 9 (1):22-33.
Pierre Bourdieu (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity. University of Chicago Press.
Jenann Ismael (2011). Reflexivity, Fixed Points, and Semantic Descent; How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Reflexivity. Acta Analytica 26 (4):295-310.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,281 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?