Ten years of public interest disclosure legislation in the UK: Are whistleblowers adequately protected? [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 82 (2):497 - 507 (2008)
Purpose The purpose of this article is to assess the operation of the UK’s Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA 1998) during its first 10 years and to consider its implications for the whistleblowing process. Method The article sets the legislation into context by discussing the common law background. It then gives detailed consideration to the statutory provisions and how they have been interpreted by the courts and tribunals. Results In assessing the impact of the legislation’s approach to whistleblowing both in the UK and elsewhere, the author draws upon empirical research. Conclusion The author concludes that PIDA 1998 has not adequately protected whistleblowers and makes 12 recommendations for change. Despite the European Commission’s acknowledgement that whistleblowers can play a part in the fight against corruption, the author notes that common standards for their protection still seem a long way off.
|Keywords||disclosure legislation protection public Interest whistleblowers|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Wim Vandekerckhove (2006). Whistleblowing and Organizational Social Responsibility: A Global Assessment. Ashgate.
Citations of this work BETA
Wim Vandekerckhove & Eva E. Tsahuridu (2010). Risky Rescues and the Duty to Blow the Whistle. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (3):365 - 380.
W. Michael Hoffman & Mark S. Schwartz (2015). The Morality of Whistleblowing: A Commentary on Richard T. De George. Journal of Business Ethics 127 (4):771-781.
Pailin Trongmateerut & John T. Sweeney (2013). The Influence of Subjective Norms on Whistle-Blowing: A Cross-Cultural Investigation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3):437-451.
Nikolay A. Dentchev, Mitchell Balen & Elvira Haezendonck (2015). On Voluntarism and the Role of Governments in CSR: Towards a Contingency Approach. Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (4):378-397.
Similar books and articles
Alexander Loke, The Protected Interests in the Private Right of Action for Insider Trading: A Comparative Perspective.
Rosemary Lyster, Chasing Down the Climate Change Footprint of the Public and Private Sectors: Forces Converge - Part I.
Thomas Alured Faunce, Whistleblowing and Scientific Misconduct: Renewing Legal and Virtue Ethics Foundations.
Shani N. Robinson, Jesse C. Robertson & Mary B. Curtis (2012). The Effects of Contextual and Wrongdoing Attributes on Organizational Employees' Whistleblowing Intentions Following Fraud. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (2):213-227.
Wim Vandekerckhove & David Lewis (2012). The Content of Whistleblowing Procedures: A Critical Review of Recent Official Guidelines. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 108 (2):253-264.
TerryMorehead Dworkin & Melissa S. Baucus (1998). Internal Vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowering Processes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1281-1298.
David Lewis (2011). Whistleblowing in a Changing Legal Climate: Is It Time to Revisit Our Approach to Trust and Loyalty at the Workplace? Business Ethics 20 (1):71-87.
Elletta Sangrey Callahan & John W. Collins (1992). Employee Attitudes Toward Whistleblowing: Management and Public Policy Implications. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (12):939 - 948.
Eva E. Tsahuridu & Wim Vandekerckhove (2008). Organisational Whistleblowing Policies: Making Employees Responsible or Liable? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):107 - 118.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads162 ( #9,735 of 1,724,750 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #72,187 of 1,724,750 )
How can I increase my downloads?