Why conditionalize
In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. Routledge (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrank Jackson, Graham Priest & David Papineau (2004). David Lewis and Schrödinger's Cat. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):153 – 169.
Richard Hanley (2004). As Good as It Gets: Lewis on Truth in Fiction. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):112 – 128.
David Papineau (2004). David Lewis and Schrödinger's Cat. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):153 – 169.
David Papineau (2004). David Lewis and Schrödinger's Cat. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):153 – 169.
Hilary Greaves & David Wallace (2006). Justifying Conditionalization: Conditionalization Maximizes Expected Epistemic Utility. Mind 115 (459):607-632.
Olga Ramirez (2012). ‘BOGHOSSIAN's BLIND REASONING’, CONDITIONALIZATION AND THICK CONCEPTS A FUNCTIONAL MODEL. Ethics in Progress Quarterly 3 (1):31-52.
Rachael Briggs (2009). Distorted Reflection. Philosophical Review 118 (1):59-85.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-05-19Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
