Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):15-25 (2010)
|Abstract||What grounds human rights? How do we determine that something is a human right? James Griffin has persuasively argued that the notion of agency should determine the content of human rights. However, Griffin's agency account faces the question of why agency should be the sole ground for human rights. For example, can Griffin's notion of agency by itself adequately explain such human rights as that against torture? Or, has Griffin offered a plausible explanation as to why one should not broaden the ground for human rights to include other elements of a good life such as freedom from great pain, understanding, deep personal relations, and so on? These concerns have been raised regarding Griffin's agency account, but in his new book, On Human Rights , Griffin has offered new arguments in support of his view that agency is the sole ground for human rights. In this paper, I examine these new arguments, and I argue that Griffin's arguments are ultimately unsuccessful.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. Ci (2005). Taking the Reasons for Human Rights Seriously. Political Theory 33 (2):243 - 265.
P. J. Lomelino (2007). Individuals and Relational Beings. Social Philosophy Today 23:87-101.
John Gardner (2008). Simply in Virtue of Being Human': The Whos and Whys of Human Rights. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2 (2).
Joseph Raz (2010). Human Rights Without Foundations. In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
Katherine Eddy (2007). On Revaluing the Currency of Human Rights. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):307-328.
James Griffin (2008). On Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Christian Barry & Nicholas Southwood (2011). What Is Special About Human Rights? Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3):369-83.
Hugh V. McLachlan (2010). Moral Rights to Life, Both Natural and Non-Natural: Reflections on James Griffin's Account of Human Rights. Diametros 26:58-76.
James Griffin (2001). The Presidential Address Discrepancies Between the Bestphilosophical Account of Human Rights and the International Law of Human Rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):1–28.
Added to index2009-09-27
Total downloads86 ( #10,703 of 756,449 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 756,449 )
How can I increase my downloads?