Aristotle's view on “the right of practice”: An investigation into Aristotle's theory of action [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):251-263 (2009)
The concept of right or fit is an important element entailed, but not fully articulated, in the concept of action or practice in Aristotle’s theory of virtue; which, however, turns to be of the utmost importance in later Western ethics. Right is concerned with both feelings and actions, and is not the same for all individuals. It lies in between the two extremes of the spectrum of practical affairs, yet by no means equidistant from them. This account of the concept of fitness or right is derived from the categories of quantity, relationship, and quality rather than from that of substance. Thus, it seems that virtue is relative to vice or error within a continuous existence. If, however, the right of passion and action is environmental and concrete, is it multiple and not singular? To this question, Aristotle gives his reply on two levels: On the level of concrete practitioners, what is right and fit to one man might not be so to another man, and hence the right of practice is not singular but multiple; whereas on the level concerned with the only right choice compared with the two extremes or errors, the right of practice will always be singular.
|Keywords||Aristotle practice virtue right 亚里士多德 实践 德性 正确|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle (2012). Nicomachean Ethics. Courier Dover Publications.
Aristotle (2006). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Henry Sidgwick (1907). The Methods of Ethics. Thoemmes Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jennifer Whiting (2002). Eudaimonia, External Results, and Choosing Virtuous Actions for Themselves. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):270-290.
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1968). Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays. Melbourne, Macmillan.
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1967). Aristotle. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Shenbai Liao (2011). The Subjectivity and Universality of Virtues—An Investigation Based on Confucius' and Aristotle's Views. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):217-238.
Sherwin Klein (1998). An Aristotelian View of Theory and Practice in Business Ethics. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (2):203-222.
Klaas Tindemans (2008). The Politics of the Poetics: Aristotle and Drama Theory in 17th Century France. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 13 (3-4):325-336.
Alfred R. Mele (1981). Choice and Virtue in the Nicomachean Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (4):405-423.
Walter A. Brogan (2002). Gadamer's Praise of Theory: Aristotle's Friend and the Reciprocity Between Theory and Practice. Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):141-155.
Liao Shenbai & Zhang Lin (2009). Aristotle's View on "The Right of Practice": An Investigation Into Aristotle's Theory of Action. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):251 - 263.
Added to index2009-05-23
Total downloads52 ( #87,491 of 2,121,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #219,397 of 2,121,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?