Rescuing human embryonic stem cell research: The blastocyst transfer method

American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):8 – 16 (2005)
Despite the therapeutic potential of human embryonic stem (HES) cells, many people believe that HES cell research should be banned. The reason is that the present method of extracting HES cells involves the destruction of the embryo, which for many is the beginning of a person. This paper examines a number of compromise solutions such as parthenogenesis, the use of defective embryos, genetically creating a "pseudo embryo" that can never form a placenta, and determining embryo death, and argues that none of these proposals are likely to satisfy embryoists, that is, those who regard the embryo as a person. This paper then proposes a method of extracting HES cells, what might be called the Blastocyst Transfer Method, that meets the ethical requirements of embryoists, and it considers some possible concerns regarding this method. It concludes by encouraging future HES cell research to investigate this method.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265160500318746
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
S. Matthew Liao (2005). Are 'Ex Ante' Enhancements Always Permissible? American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):23 – 25.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Françoise Baylis (2005). Embryological Viability. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):17 – 18.
John A. Robertson (2005). Blastocyst Transfer (Sic) is No Solution. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):18 – 20.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

41 ( #80,557 of 1,724,875 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #72,191 of 1,724,875 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.