Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):339-349 (2012)
|Abstract||Engineering ethics education is a complex field characterized by dynamic topics and diverse students, which results in significant challenges for engineering ethics educators. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a systematic approach to determine what to teach and how to teach in an ethics curriculum. This is a topic that has not been adequately addressed in the engineering ethics literature. This systematic approach provides a method to: (1) develop a context-specific engineering ethics curriculum using the Delphi technique, a process-driven research method; and (2) identify appropriate delivery strategies and instructional strategies using an instructional design model. This approach considers the context-specific needs of different engineering disciplines in ethics education and leverages the collaboration of engineering professors, practicing engineers, engineering graduate students, ethics scholars, and instructional design experts. The proposed approach is most suitable for a department, a discipline/field or a professional society. The approach helps to enhance learning outcomes and to facilitate ethics education curriculum development as part of the regular engineering curriculum.|
|Keywords||Engineering ethics Ethics education Systematic approach Engineering education Collaborative Instructional design|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Susan Magun-Jackson (2004). A Psychological Model That Integrates Ethics in Engineering Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):219-224.
Robert E. McGinn (2003). “Mind the Gaps”: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997–2001. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):517-542.
Mary L. Cummings (2006). Integrating Ethics in Design Through the Value-Sensitive Design Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4).
Keith E. Elder (2004). Ethics Education in the Consulting Engineering Environment: Where Do We Start? Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):325-336.
Steven P. Nichols (2000). An Approach to Integrating “Professional Responsibility” in Engineering Into the Capstone Design Experience. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):399-412.
Steven M. Culver, Ishwar K. Puri, Richard E. Wokutch & Vinod Lohani (2013). Comparison of Engagement with Ethics Between an Engineering and a Business Program. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):585-597.
E. Alpay (forthcoming). Student-Inspired Activities for the Teaching and Learning of Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Jimmy H. Smith (2005). Topics and Cases for Online Education in Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):451-458.
Wha-Chul Son (2008). Philosophy of Technology and Macro-Ethics in Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):405-415.
Katherine Austin Byron Newberry, Greta Gorsuch William Lawson & Thomas Darwin (forthcoming). Acclimating International Graduate Students to Professional Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Eddie Conlon & Henk Zandvoort (2011). Broadening Ethics Teaching in Engineering: Beyond the Individualistic Approach. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):217-232.
Byron Newberry, Katherine Austin, William Lawson, Greta Gorsuch & Thomas Darwin (2011). Acclimating International Graduate Students to Professional Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):171-194.
Michael Alfred & Christopher Chung (2012). Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Second Generation Interactive Simulator for Engineering Ethics Education (SEEE2). Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):689-697.
Donna Riley (2013). Hidden in Plain View: Feminists Doing Engineering Ethics, Engineers Doing Feminist Ethics. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):189-206.
Added to index2010-11-26
Total downloads15 ( #85,942 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?