Graduate studies at Western
Hastings Center Report 37 (2):16-20 (2007)
|Abstract||The story of Ashley, a nine-year-old from Seattle, has caused a good deal of controversy since it appeared in the Los Angeles Times on January 3, 2007.1 Ashley was born with a condition called static encephalopathy, a severe brain impairment that leaves her unable to walk, talk, eat, sit up, or roll over. According to her doctors, Ashley has reached, and will remain at, the developmental level of a three-month-old.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Julian Savulescu (2007). Future People, Involuntary Medical Treatment in Pregnancy and the Duty of Easy Rescue. Utilitas 19 (1):1-20.
S. D. Edwards (2008). The Ashley Treatment: A Step Too Far, or Not Far Enough? Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):341-343.
N. Tan & I. Brassington (2009). Agency, Duties and the "Ashley Treatment". Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):658-661.
Ruchika Mishra (2010). The Case: The “Ashley Treatment” Revisited. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (03):407-.
Hugh Dalton (1914). Book Review:Gold and Prices. W. J. Ashley; Environment and Efficiency. M. H. Thomson; The Social Policy of Bismarck. Annie Ashley. [REVIEW] Ethics 24 (2):246-.
Julian Savulescu (1994). Rational Desires and the Limitation of Life-Sustaining Treatment. Bioethics 8 (3):191–222.
Julian Savulescu (1994). Treatment Limitation Decisions Under Uncertainty: The Value of Subsequent Euthanasia. Bioethics 8 (1):49–73.
S. Matthew Liao, Julian Savulescu & Mark Sheehan (2007). The Ashley Treatment: Best Interests, Convenience, and Parental Decision-Making. Hastings Center Report 37 (2):16-20.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #86,056 of 739,542 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,542 )
How can I increase my downloads?