David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia 40 (2):395-402 (2012)
Julia Driver has argued that there is a special set of actions, lodged between neutral actions and wrongful actions called suberogatory actions. These actions are not impermissible, according to Driver, but still strike us as troubling or bad, and are therefore worse than morally neutral (1992). Since this paper was written 20 years ago, many philosophers have utilized or alluded to this moral territory. The existence of some action-types that are not wrong but still carry some dis-value has become a staple in the realm of moral evaluation. However, Driver's argument for the existence of this moral territory amounts to three types of moral cases that, according to Driver, can only be explained by the existence of the suberogatory. In this short paper, I will respond by saying that we can account for these cases using our traditional notions of moral neutrality and moral wrongness. The temptation of invoking the suberogatory is that it can be used as a substitute for answering a variety of hard ethical questions. However appealing this substitute may be, we should resist it so long as the problem cases put forward to motivate the new evaluative realm can be handled, and handled well, by our traditional apparatus.
|Keywords||Suberogatory Supererogatory Obligation Moral evaluation Gratitude Abortion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Singer (1972). Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Alan Wertheimer (1996). Exploitation. Princeton University Press.
Leif Wenar (2005). The Nature of Rights. Philosophy
Public Affairs 33 (3):223-252.
Jeremy Waldron (1981). A Right to Do Wrong. Ethics 92 (1):21-39.
Citations of this work BETA
Alfred Archer (forthcoming). The Supererogatory and How Not To Accommodate It: A Reply to Dorsey. Utilitas:1-10.
Franco Palazzi (2014). Would Human Extinction Be Morally Wrong? Philosophia 42 (4):1063-1084.
Similar books and articles
Julia Driver (1992). The Suberogatory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (3):286 – 295.
Julia Driver (2007). Dream Immorality. Philosophy 82 (1):5-22.
Julie Tannenbaum (2007). Emotional Expressions of Moral Value. Philosophical Studies 132 (1):43 - 57.
Michael Jeffrey Winter (2012). Does Moral Virtue Require Knowledge? A Response to Julia Driver. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):533 - 546.
Jason Kawall (2003). Self-Regarding Supererogatory Actions. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (3):487–498.
Lawrence Alexander (1984). Another Look at Moral Blackmail. Philosophy Research Archives 10:189-196.
Alastair Norcross (1997). Good and Bad Actions. Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
Julia Driver (2001). Uneasy Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Swinburne (1976). Reply to Wallace's 'on Making Actions Morally Wrong'. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6:551 - 552.
Kate Falkenstien (2013). Explaining the Effect of Morality on Intentionality of Lucky Actions: The Role of Underlying Questions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):293-308.
Luke Robinson (2006). Moral Holism, Moral Generalism, and Moral Dispositionalism. Mind 115 (458):331-360.
Julia Markovits (2012). Saints, Heroes, Sages, and Villains. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):289-311.
Michael Slote (2004). Driver's Virtues. Utilitas 16 (1):22-32.
Sean McAleer (2010). Four Solutions to the Alleged Incompleteness of Virtue Ethics. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (3):1-20.
Added to index2011-12-15
Total downloads63 ( #54,147 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #147,227 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?