David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Logos and Episteme 2 (3):455-464 (2011)
Steven Hales constructs a novel argument against the possibility of presentist time travel called the suicide machine argument. Hales argues that if presentism were true, then time travel would result in the annihilation of the time traveler. But such a consequence is not time travel, therefore presentism cannot allow for the possibility of time travel. This paper argues that in order for the suicide machine argument to succeed, it must make (at least) one of two assumptions, each of which beg the question. The argument must either assume that the sequence of moments is invariant, or that time travel requires distinct, co-instantiated moments. Because the former disjunct assumes that presentist time travel is impossible and the latter assumes that presentism is impossible, the suicide machine argument fails.
|Keywords||presentism Steven Hales time travel suicide machine argument|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jimmy Alfonso Licon (2012). Still No Suicide for Presentists: Why Hales’ Response Fails. Logos and Episteme (1):149-155.
Steven D. Hales (2010). No Time Travel for Presentists. Logos and Episteme 1 (2):353-360.
Theodore Sider (2005). Travelling in A- and B- Time. The Monist 88 (3):329-335.
Kurt Stocker (2012). The Time Machine in Our Mind. Cognitive Science 36 (3):385-420.
William Grey (1999). Troubles with Time Travel. Philosophy 74 (1):55-70.
Nick Smith (2005). Why Would Time Travelers Try to Kill Their Younger Selves? The Monist 88 (3):388-395.
Douglas Kutach (2013). Time Travel and Time Machines. In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Blackwell.
Phil Dowe (2000). The Case for Time Travel. Philosophy 75 (3):441-451.
David Wittenberg (2013). Time Travel: The Popular Philosophy of Narrative. Fordham University Press.
Phil Dowe (2003). The Coincidences of Time Travel. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):574-589.
John Earman (1967). On Going Backward in Time. Philosophy of Science 34 (3):211-222.
Theodore Sider (2002). Time Travel, Coincidences and Counterfactuals. Philosophical Studies 110 (2):115 - 138.
Heather Dyke (2005). The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Time Travel. Think 9 (9):43-52.
Bradley Monton (2003). Presentists Can Believe in Closed Timelike Curves. Analysis 63 (3):199–202.
Added to index2011-10-20
Total downloads38 ( #50,240 of 1,168,878 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #37,974 of 1,168,878 )
How can I increase my downloads?