David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2006)
One of the main themes that has emerged from behavioral decision research during the past three decades is the view that people's preferences are often constructed in the process of elicitation. This idea is derived from studies demonstrating that normatively equivalent methods of elicitation (e.g., choice and pricing) give rise to systematically different responses. These preference reversals violate the principle of procedure invariance that is fundamental to all theories of rational choice. If different elicitation procedures produce different orderings of options, how can preferences be defined and in what sense do they exist? This book shows not only the historical roots of preference construction but also the blossoming of the concept within psychology, law, marketing, philosophy, environmental policy, and economics. Decision making is now understood to be a highly contingent form of information processing, sensitive to task complexity, time pressure, response mode, framing, reference points, and other contextual factors.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$12.64 new (81% off) $12.95 used (81% off) $51.56 direct from Amazon (21% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BF611.C65 2006|
|ISBN(s)||9780521834285 0521834287 0521542200 9780521542203|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
Jerome R. Busemeyer, Joseph G. Johnson & Ryan K. Jessup, Preferences Constructed From Dynamic Micro-Processing Mechanisms.
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michiru Nagatsu (2013). The Limits of Unification for Theory Appraisal: A Case of Economics and Psychology. Synthese 190 (2):2267-2289.
Chen Li, Zhihua Li & Peter P. Wakker (forthcoming). If Nudge Cannot Be Applied: A Litmus Test of the Readers' Stance on Paternalism. [REVIEW] Theory and Decision:1-19.
Herbert Gintis (2006). The Foundations of Behavior: The Beliefs, Preferences, and Constraints Model. Biological Theory 1 (2):123-127.
Alan G. Sanfey (2009). Expectations and Social Decision-Making: Biasing Effects of Prior Knowledge on Ultimatum Responses. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 8 (1):93-107.
Manel Baucells & Antonio Villasís (2010). Stability of Risk Preferences and the Reflection Effect of Prospect Theory. Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):193-211.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Read (2009). Experimental Tests of Rationality. In Paul Anand, Prasanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. OUP Oxford
James E. Mazur (2000). Contextual Choice and Other Models of Preference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):108-109.
Daniel M. Hausman (2005). Sympathy, Commitment, and Preference. Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):33-50.
Franz Dietrich & Christian List (2011). A Model of Non-Informational Preference Change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 23 (2):145-164.
Isaac Levi (2008). Why Rational Agents Should Not Be Liberal Maximizers. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):1-17.
Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca (2008). A Preference for Selfish Preferences: The Problem of Motivations in Rational Choice Political Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):361-378.
Isabelle Brocas (2011). Dynamic Inconsistency and Choice. Theory and Decision 71 (3):343-364.
Sven Ove Hansson (2009). Preference-Based Choice Functions: A Generalized Approach. Synthese 171 (2):257 - 269.
Sven Ove Hansson (1996). Decision Theoretic Foundations for Axioms of Rational Preference. Synthese 109 (3):401 - 412.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #106,196 of 1,707,716 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #266,161 of 1,707,716 )
How can I increase my downloads?