Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):259-269 (2008)
|Abstract||In this paper I analyze representations of scholarly output for the purpose of identifying corrupt practices. Accordingly, the components of output—price, quantity, and time—are examined. A key part of the analysis is recognizing the unique role that the scholarly community plays in scholarship and the implications this has for the roles of groups other than the scholarly community. Finally, a survey of students indicates that particular representations of scholarly output are viewed by students as unethical.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas Nagel (1973). Rawls on Justice. Philosophical Review 82 (2):220-234.
John MacKenzie Owen (2002). The New Dissemination of Knowledge: Digital Libraries and Institutional Roles in Scholarly Publishing. Journal of Economic Methodology 9 (3):275-288.
S. Phillips (1998). Are Feedforward and Recurrent Networks Systematic? Analysis and Implications for a Connectionist Cognitive Architecture. .
Robert J. Yanal (1992). Still Unconverted: A Reply to Neill. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (4):324-326.
HI Browman & KI Stergiou (2008). INTRODUCTION Factors and Indices Are One Thing, Deciding Who is Scholarly, Why They Are Scholarly, and the Relative Value of Their Scholarship is Something Else Entirely. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8:1-3.
Daniel Callahan (1992). When Self‐Detertnination Runs Amok. Hastings Center Report 22 (2):52-55.
Thomas E. Hill (1980). Humanity as an End in Itself. Ethics 91 (1):84 - 99.
Ronald Dworkin (1981). What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (4):283 - 345.
Robin T. Peterson (1994). Depiction of Idealized Youth Lifestyles in Magazine Advertisements: A Content Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):259 - 269.
Added to index2009-04-04
Total downloads6 ( #154,629 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?